In article <YM0pd.184511$Np3.7470806@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
"EDDIE O'CONNOR" <ronnoco@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

> The same amount of pressure. From the bottom hole it has to lift it's
> diameter in water, and from the top it has to lift it's own volume of water
> in the hose up to the top so it can just gravity drop into the barrel. Same
> amount of energy required by the pump.

O.K. At this point I admit I'm no doctor of physics. I also have to
admit it was my idea to install the top fill bung thinking it would be
easier to fill because I wouldn't be filling against a barrel full of
water. So I lose the argument. HOWEVER... I also want to leave the hose
attached to the top fill bung so I don't have to re-attach a water
filled, running, hose back to the cabin.

Thanks!

--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

In article <YM0pd.184511$Np3.7470806@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
"EDDIE O'CONNOR" <ronnoco@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

> The same amount of pressure. From the bottom hole it has to lift it's
> diameter in water, and from the top it has to lift it's own volume of water
> in the hose up to the top so it can just gravity drop into the barrel. Same
> amount of energy required by the pump.

O.K. At this point I admit I'm no doctor of physics. I also have to
admit it was my idea to install the top fill bung thinking it would be
easier to fill because I wouldn't be filling against a barrel full of
water. So I lose the argument. HOWEVER... I also want to leave the hose
attached to the top fill bung so I don't have to re-attach a water
filled, running, hose back to the cabin.

Thanks!

--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

In article <YM0pd.184511$Np3.7470806@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>,
"EDDIE O'CONNOR" <ronnoco@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

> The same amount of pressure. From the bottom hole it has to lift it's
> diameter in water, and from the top it has to lift it's own volume of water
> in the hose up to the top so it can just gravity drop into the barrel. Same
> amount of energy required by the pump.

O.K. At this point I admit I'm no doctor of physics. I also have to
admit it was my idea to install the top fill bung thinking it would be
easier to fill because I wouldn't be filling against a barrel full of
water. So I lose the argument. HOWEVER... I also want to leave the hose
attached to the top fill bung so I don't have to re-attach a water
filled, running, hose back to the cabin.

Thanks!

--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

In article
<tN0pd.966346$Gx4.269200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Lynn Guini" <Lynn@nospan.com> wrote:

> a bit easier to pump to the bottom bung, until the water level in the raised
> barrel rises. The fact that the hose has less volume of water than the
> barrel is irrelevant - it is the height you are pumping the water that
> matters.
>
> but pumping to the top bung might prevent a problem if the hose comes loose.

O.K. At this point I admit I'm no doctor of physics. I also have to
admit it was my idea to install the top fill bung thinking it would be
easier to fill because I wouldn't be filling against a barrel full of
water. So I lose the argument. HOWEVER... I also want to leave the hose
attached to the top fill bung so I don't have to re-attach a water
filled, running, hose back to the cabin.

Thanks!

--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

In article
<tN0pd.966346$Gx4.269200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Lynn Guini" <Lynn@nospan.com> wrote:

> a bit easier to pump to the bottom bung, until the water level in the raised
> barrel rises. The fact that the hose has less volume of water than the
> barrel is irrelevant - it is the height you are pumping the water that
> matters.
>
> but pumping to the top bung might prevent a problem if the hose comes loose.

O.K. At this point I admit I'm no doctor of physics. I also have to
admit it was my idea to install the top fill bung thinking it would be
easier to fill because I wouldn't be filling against a barrel full of
water. So I lose the argument. HOWEVER... I also want to leave the hose
attached to the top fill bung so I don't have to re-attach a water
filled, running, hose back to the cabin.

Thanks!

--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

In article
<tN0pd.966346$Gx4.269200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Lynn Guini" <Lynn@nospan.com> wrote:

> a bit easier to pump to the bottom bung, until the water level in the raised
> barrel rises. The fact that the hose has less volume of water than the
> barrel is irrelevant - it is the height you are pumping the water that
> matters.
>
> but pumping to the top bung might prevent a problem if the hose comes loose.

O.K. At this point I admit I'm no doctor of physics. I also have to
admit it was my idea to install the top fill bung thinking it would be
easier to fill because I wouldn't be filling against a barrel full of
water. So I lose the argument. HOWEVER... I also want to leave the hose
attached to the top fill bung so I don't have to re-attach a water
filled, running, hose back to the cabin.

Thanks!

--
Member AAAAAAAA
American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

LOL!

Water is heavy. How many PSI comes out that bottom hole?

The pump must first overcome this pressure before it can start filling
the tank. That can easily mean the pump will 'run backward' and fill up
the truck if the top tank has enough weight in it.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Jeepers wrote:
>
> O.k. got an argument to solve.
>
> Have a 55 gal. barrel, on a 8 to 10 foot tall platform (to provide water
> in deer camp).
>
> It has three bungs. One on the bottom side (drain/flow). Two on the top
> side. One for vent, one for fill.
>
> There is another barrel in the bed of a pickup, full of water. There are
> two pumps, one hand diaphragm type or one typical 12v bilge type. This
> is the source of water to fill the high barrel.
>
> The argument is that the water can be just as easily pumped into the
> barrel through the drain bung, from below, as it could be through the
> top fill bung. There is an assertion that the pressure inside the hose
> is greater in the lower fill hose than in the upper fill hose, due to
> the weight of the water in the barrel as it fills.
>
> Which, if any, fill location would require more or less force to fill
> this barrel: the top hole or the bottom hole?
>
> --
> Member AAAAAAAA
> American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

LOL!

Water is heavy. How many PSI comes out that bottom hole?

The pump must first overcome this pressure before it can start filling
the tank. That can easily mean the pump will 'run backward' and fill up
the truck if the top tank has enough weight in it.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Jeepers wrote:
>
> O.k. got an argument to solve.
>
> Have a 55 gal. barrel, on a 8 to 10 foot tall platform (to provide water
> in deer camp).
>
> It has three bungs. One on the bottom side (drain/flow). Two on the top
> side. One for vent, one for fill.
>
> There is another barrel in the bed of a pickup, full of water. There are
> two pumps, one hand diaphragm type or one typical 12v bilge type. This
> is the source of water to fill the high barrel.
>
> The argument is that the water can be just as easily pumped into the
> barrel through the drain bung, from below, as it could be through the
> top fill bung. There is an assertion that the pressure inside the hose
> is greater in the lower fill hose than in the upper fill hose, due to
> the weight of the water in the barrel as it fills.
>
> Which, if any, fill location would require more or less force to fill
> this barrel: the top hole or the bottom hole?
>
> --
> Member AAAAAAAA
> American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

LOL!

Water is heavy. How many PSI comes out that bottom hole?

The pump must first overcome this pressure before it can start filling
the tank. That can easily mean the pump will 'run backward' and fill up
the truck if the top tank has enough weight in it.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Jeepers wrote:
>
> O.k. got an argument to solve.
>
> Have a 55 gal. barrel, on a 8 to 10 foot tall platform (to provide water
> in deer camp).
>
> It has three bungs. One on the bottom side (drain/flow). Two on the top
> side. One for vent, one for fill.
>
> There is another barrel in the bed of a pickup, full of water. There are
> two pumps, one hand diaphragm type or one typical 12v bilge type. This
> is the source of water to fill the high barrel.
>
> The argument is that the water can be just as easily pumped into the
> barrel through the drain bung, from below, as it could be through the
> top fill bung. There is an assertion that the pressure inside the hose
> is greater in the lower fill hose than in the upper fill hose, due to
> the weight of the water in the barrel as it fills.
>
> Which, if any, fill location would require more or less force to fill
> this barrel: the top hole or the bottom hole?
>
> --
> Member AAAAAAAA
> American Association Against Acronym Abuse And Also Ambiguity.
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

Jeepers wrote:

> O.k. got an argument to solve.
>
> Have a 55 gal. barrel, on a 8 to 10 foot tall platform (to provide water
> in deer camp).
>
> It has three bungs. One on the bottom side (drain/flow). Two on the top
> side. One for vent, one for fill.
>
> There is another barrel in the bed of a pickup, full of water. There are
> two pumps, one hand diaphragm type or one typical 12v bilge type. This
> is the source of water to fill the high barrel.
>
> The argument is that the water can be just as easily pumped into the
> barrel through the drain bung, from below, as it could be through the
> top fill bung. There is an assertion that the pressure inside the hose
> is greater in the lower fill hose than in the upper fill hose, due to
> the weight of the water in the barrel as it fills.

It will work. At my cabin (no electricity) we have a 500 gal drum on a
30 foot platform. It fills and drains through the same 1" hose.
No problems at all.