OT- Oil Prices
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
"The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
> retirement portfolio. ;o)
>
> Earle
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Bill,
While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as
part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance.
Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on
both long and short term gains. <LOL>
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@***.net...
> Matt,
> Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
> "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
> That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
> http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
> of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
> store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > The ones who sell us the oil:
> >
> > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
> >
> > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
> >
> > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as
part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance.
Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on
both long and short term gains. <LOL>
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@***.net...
> Matt,
> Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and
> "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously???????
> That sixty six percent is still less than six percent:
> http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one
> of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your
> store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO>
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > The ones who sell us the oil:
> >
> > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
> >
> > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
> >
> > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?