OT- Oil Prices
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs??????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>
> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil
> buddies rich...
benefit from higher product costs??????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>
> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil
> buddies rich...
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs??????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>
> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil
> buddies rich...
benefit from higher product costs??????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>
> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil
> buddies rich...
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs??????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>
> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil
> buddies rich...
benefit from higher product costs??????
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>
> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil
> buddies rich...
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd
quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> benefit from higher product costs??????
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
>> per
>> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
>>
>> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
>> oil
>> buddies rich...
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>
retirement portfolio. ;o)
Earle
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com...
> The ones who sell us the oil:
>
> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm
>
> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the
2nd
> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43012C94.368BE7EB@***.net...
> > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
> > benefit from higher product costs??????
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+
> >> per
> >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge.
> >>
> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his
> >> oil
> >> buddies rich...
>
>