OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
#181
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
No, a victory for Big Business and Big Government.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C08A32.16A49AAE@***.net...
> I look at it like it's a victory for the moral majority.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > It wasn't the Super Bowl, you know...but that's the problem
> > nowadays...people look at it like it is some kind of sporting event.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C08A32.16A49AAE@***.net...
> I look at it like it's a victory for the moral majority.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > It wasn't the Super Bowl, you know...but that's the problem
> > nowadays...people look at it like it is some kind of sporting event.
#182
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken charge.
>
> You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are as
> naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that hard
> to believe.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken charge.
>
> You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are as
> naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that hard
> to believe.
#183
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken charge.
>
> You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are as
> naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that hard
> to believe.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken charge.
>
> You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are as
> naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that hard
> to believe.
#184
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken charge.
>
> You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are as
> naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that hard
> to believe.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken charge.
>
> You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are as
> naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that hard
> to believe.
#185
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the old
boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term. Sure,
some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his cabinet
members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
opportunity to move on.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
charge.
> >
> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
as
> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
hard
> > to believe.
boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term. Sure,
some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his cabinet
members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
opportunity to move on.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
charge.
> >
> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
as
> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
hard
> > to believe.
#186
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the old
boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term. Sure,
some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his cabinet
members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
opportunity to move on.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
charge.
> >
> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
as
> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
hard
> > to believe.
boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term. Sure,
some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his cabinet
members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
opportunity to move on.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
charge.
> >
> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
as
> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
hard
> > to believe.
#187
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the old
boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term. Sure,
some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his cabinet
members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
opportunity to move on.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
charge.
> >
> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
as
> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
hard
> > to believe.
boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term. Sure,
some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his cabinet
members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
opportunity to move on.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
charge.
> >
> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
as
> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
hard
> > to believe.
#188
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Ther's nothng unusual about most cabinet members resigning after a
President's first term. For our special interest, off-roading, and as a
Westerner, I'm glad to see Gail Norton is staying on. She's done a great job
in keeping a balance re: our trails, and has kept the environmentalist
crazies at bay.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:10s1e3o48mqp914@corp.supernews.com...
> It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the
> old
> boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term.
> Sure,
> some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
> never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his
> cabinet
> members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
> the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
> opportunity to move on.
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
>> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >
>> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
> charge.
>> >
>> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
> as
>> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
> hard
>> > to believe.
>
>
President's first term. For our special interest, off-roading, and as a
Westerner, I'm glad to see Gail Norton is staying on. She's done a great job
in keeping a balance re: our trails, and has kept the environmentalist
crazies at bay.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:10s1e3o48mqp914@corp.supernews.com...
> It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the
> old
> boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term.
> Sure,
> some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
> never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his
> cabinet
> members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
> the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
> opportunity to move on.
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
>> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >
>> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
> charge.
>> >
>> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
> as
>> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
> hard
>> > to believe.
>
>
#189
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Ther's nothng unusual about most cabinet members resigning after a
President's first term. For our special interest, off-roading, and as a
Westerner, I'm glad to see Gail Norton is staying on. She's done a great job
in keeping a balance re: our trails, and has kept the environmentalist
crazies at bay.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:10s1e3o48mqp914@corp.supernews.com...
> It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the
> old
> boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term.
> Sure,
> some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
> never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his
> cabinet
> members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
> the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
> opportunity to move on.
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
>> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >
>> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
> charge.
>> >
>> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
> as
>> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
> hard
>> > to believe.
>
>
President's first term. For our special interest, off-roading, and as a
Westerner, I'm glad to see Gail Norton is staying on. She's done a great job
in keeping a balance re: our trails, and has kept the environmentalist
crazies at bay.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:10s1e3o48mqp914@corp.supernews.com...
> It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the
> old
> boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term.
> Sure,
> some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
> never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his
> cabinet
> members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
> the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
> opportunity to move on.
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
>> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >
>> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
> charge.
>> >
>> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
> as
>> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
> hard
>> > to believe.
>
>
#190
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Ther's nothng unusual about most cabinet members resigning after a
President's first term. For our special interest, off-roading, and as a
Westerner, I'm glad to see Gail Norton is staying on. She's done a great job
in keeping a balance re: our trails, and has kept the environmentalist
crazies at bay.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:10s1e3o48mqp914@corp.supernews.com...
> It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the
> old
> boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term.
> Sure,
> some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
> never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his
> cabinet
> members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
> the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
> opportunity to move on.
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
>> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >
>> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
> charge.
>> >
>> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
> as
>> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
> hard
>> > to believe.
>
>
President's first term. For our special interest, off-roading, and as a
Westerner, I'm glad to see Gail Norton is staying on. She's done a great job
in keeping a balance re: our trails, and has kept the environmentalist
crazies at bay.
"Jeff Strickland" <spamcatcher@yahoo.net> wrote in message
news:10s1e3o48mqp914@corp.supernews.com...
> It was lost on me as well. In this case, the new boss is the same as the
> old
> boss. It is common for Cabinet members to retire after the first term.
> Sure,
> some will stay, but some always leave. Not sometimes, always. There has
> never been a President who upon relection did not loose some of his
> cabinet
> members and other high ranking officials in his administration. Normally,
> the President moves them out, but there are always a few that take the
> opportunity to move on.
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:41C0A50D.78FD56A4@***.net...
>> I see my analogy was lost on you, as usual.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >
>> > But your model doesn't fit...a new boss unfortunately hasn't taken
> charge.
>> >
>> > You may believe what you want. It's hard for me to believe that you are
> as
>> > naive and easily swayed by propaganda. On second thought, it's not that
> hard
>> > to believe.
>
>