OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
#111
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
It's funny (maybe not) but Bush's transparent reason(s) for invading Iraq sound
a lot like Hitler's justification for invading the Rhineland. Let's remember
Iraq never attacked the US and never harbored Al-quaeda. The US unilaterally
attacked Iraq w/no provocation.
>History, if written objectively and not by the current bunch of panty-waist
>revisionist tyrant apologists, will likely be very kind to this man; he
>leads. As the inauguration of Karzai yesterday indicates, where he leads,
>people become free.
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
a lot like Hitler's justification for invading the Rhineland. Let's remember
Iraq never attacked the US and never harbored Al-quaeda. The US unilaterally
attacked Iraq w/no provocation.
>History, if written objectively and not by the current bunch of panty-waist
>revisionist tyrant apologists, will likely be very kind to this man; he
>leads. As the inauguration of Karzai yesterday indicates, where he leads,
>people become free.
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#112
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
It's funny (maybe not) but Bush's transparent reason(s) for invading Iraq sound
a lot like Hitler's justification for invading the Rhineland. Let's remember
Iraq never attacked the US and never harbored Al-quaeda. The US unilaterally
attacked Iraq w/no provocation.
>History, if written objectively and not by the current bunch of panty-waist
>revisionist tyrant apologists, will likely be very kind to this man; he
>leads. As the inauguration of Karzai yesterday indicates, where he leads,
>people become free.
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
a lot like Hitler's justification for invading the Rhineland. Let's remember
Iraq never attacked the US and never harbored Al-quaeda. The US unilaterally
attacked Iraq w/no provocation.
>History, if written objectively and not by the current bunch of panty-waist
>revisionist tyrant apologists, will likely be very kind to this man; he
>leads. As the inauguration of Karzai yesterday indicates, where he leads,
>people become free.
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#113
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I don't
care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>
>Daren
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>
>Daren
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I don't
care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>
>Daren
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>
>Daren
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#115
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I don't
care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>
>Daren
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>
>Daren
>
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#116
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Ahhhh I see now. Control who counts the votes? Come on, you really have to
be kidding. It amazes me to see what people will come up with when their
candidate loses.
Daren
> Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I
> don't
> care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>
>>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>>
>>Daren
>>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
be kidding. It amazes me to see what people will come up with when their
candidate loses.
Daren
> Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I
> don't
> care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>
>>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>>
>>Daren
>>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#117
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Ahhhh I see now. Control who counts the votes? Come on, you really have to
be kidding. It amazes me to see what people will come up with when their
candidate loses.
Daren
> Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I
> don't
> care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>
>>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>>
>>Daren
>>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
be kidding. It amazes me to see what people will come up with when their
candidate loses.
Daren
> Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I
> don't
> care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>
>>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>>
>>Daren
>>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
Ahhhh I see now. Control who counts the votes? Come on, you really have to
be kidding. It amazes me to see what people will come up with when their
candidate loses.
Daren
> Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I
> don't
> care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>
>>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>>
>>Daren
>>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
be kidding. It amazes me to see what people will come up with when their
candidate loses.
Daren
> Either that or control who counted those same votes. Like Stalin said: I
> don't
> care who votes for who, as long as I get to count the votes.
>
>>Obviously he could inspire SOME people. Popular vote AND electoral vote.
>>
>>Daren
>>
>
>
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
"F. Robert Falbo" <rfalbo1@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.12.14.21.41.32.536198@twcny.rr.com.. .
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:35:33 -0800, L.W.------ wrote:
>
>> And I take great comfort in knowing he meant it! Unlike like
>> Clifton's feeble attempts at shooting a tent and drug factory, if he had
>> kill someone, anyone, maybe 9/11 would have never happened.
>
> 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened if your hero (Bush) hadden't snoozed
> through the first 9 months of his presidency. The CIA did everything but
> kick him in the *** to get him to take terrorism seriously. Even when his
> daily briefing spelled it out in plain english, his only responce was to
> go back to putzing around on his "ranch". No call to arms, no high state
> of alert, nada! Oh, I take that back... Rumsfeld called for a reduction
> in the budget for Richard Clarke's antiterrorism dept.
>
What does this have to do with Jeeps? Please take it offline/elsewhere.
(You lost, get over it.)
#120
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT Less we forget, our American heroes.
"F. Robert Falbo" <rfalbo1@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.12.14.21.41.32.536198@twcny.rr.com.. .
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:35:33 -0800, L.W.------ wrote:
>
>> And I take great comfort in knowing he meant it! Unlike like
>> Clifton's feeble attempts at shooting a tent and drug factory, if he had
>> kill someone, anyone, maybe 9/11 would have never happened.
>
> 9/11 probably wouldn't have happened if your hero (Bush) hadden't snoozed
> through the first 9 months of his presidency. The CIA did everything but
> kick him in the *** to get him to take terrorism seriously. Even when his
> daily briefing spelled it out in plain english, his only responce was to
> go back to putzing around on his "ranch". No call to arms, no high state
> of alert, nada! Oh, I take that back... Rumsfeld called for a reduction
> in the budget for Richard Clarke's antiterrorism dept.
>
What does this have to do with Jeeps? Please take it offline/elsewhere.
(You lost, get over it.)