L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

What history? I bet you've never even lifted the hood of a
327"-427" Camaro or 389"-455" Firebird. And they're displayed at least
once a month on every main street U.S.of A. Pity.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> If you're more comfortable being wrong, just so long as you're older
> than me, I guess I can see your point.
>
> How was it "obvious" that I wasn't around during the muscle car era? Are
> you saying that I show my youth by being correct about the history of
> Camaro's and Firebirds?

Simon Juncal

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> What history?

You know the parts of my previous posts that you've avoided addressing
and possibly even avoided reading because they mentioned various parts
that the two cars have shared over 35 years and four generations? Do you
usually go to this extent to avoid finding out that you're wrong?

> I bet you've never even lifted the hood of a
> 327"-427" Camaro or 389"-455" Firebird. And they're displayed at least
> once a month on every main street U.S.of A. Pity.

You'd lose the bet, now stop trying to change the subject.

Simon Juncal

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> What history?

You know the parts of my previous posts that you've avoided addressing
and possibly even avoided reading because they mentioned various parts
that the two cars have shared over 35 years and four generations? Do you
usually go to this extent to avoid finding out that you're wrong?

> I bet you've never even lifted the hood of a
> 327"-427" Camaro or 389"-455" Firebird. And they're displayed at least
> once a month on every main street U.S.of A. Pity.

You'd lose the bet, now stop trying to change the subject.

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

And you didn't do that by eliminating the first fifteen years of
their design? Hypocrite! Now go play with your little Mustang V6.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> You know the parts of my previous posts that you've avoided addressing
> and possibly even avoided reading because they mentioned various parts
> that the two cars have shared over 35 years and four generations? Do you
> usually go to this extent to avoid finding out that you're wrong?
>
> You'd lose the bet, now stop trying to change the subject.

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

And you didn't do that by eliminating the first fifteen years of
their design? Hypocrite! Now go play with your little Mustang V6.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> You know the parts of my previous posts that you've avoided addressing
> and possibly even avoided reading because they mentioned various parts
> that the two cars have shared over 35 years and four generations? Do you
> usually go to this extent to avoid finding out that you're wrong?
>
> You'd lose the bet, now stop trying to change the subject.

Simon Juncal

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> And you didn't do that by eliminating the first fifteen years of
> their design? Hypocrite! Now go play with your little Mustang V6.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

I didn't eliminate the first 15 years, or change the subject... The
subject was an 85. I mentioned the first generation which share sheet
metal and chassis... Contrary to your claim that GM cars share NOTHING.
You and ONLY you brought up the Muscle car era (when we're talking about
pony cars). Then when presented with the fact that even 67+ f-bodies
share parts you claim I'm eliminating 15 years of their history!

I've proven my point in spades and all you can do is try to insult me in
the attempt to avoid admitting you didn't know what you were talking
about. BTW you'll definitely want to avoid talking about Mustangs as
well if you think a 95 GT has a V6.

Simon Juncal

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> And you didn't do that by eliminating the first fifteen years of
> their design? Hypocrite! Now go play with your little Mustang V6.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

I didn't eliminate the first 15 years, or change the subject... The
subject was an 85. I mentioned the first generation which share sheet
metal and chassis... Contrary to your claim that GM cars share NOTHING.
You and ONLY you brought up the Muscle car era (when we're talking about
pony cars). Then when presented with the fact that even 67+ f-bodies
share parts you claim I'm eliminating 15 years of their history!

I've proven my point in spades and all you can do is try to insult me in
the attempt to avoid admitting you didn't know what you were talking
about. BTW you'll definitely want to avoid talking about Mustangs as
well if you think a 95 GT has a V6.