OT: Firearms Manufacturer Question
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
In article <NDsqe.1248$Ub4.26@fe06.lga>,
"Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote:
>
> It will be for tactical entry, also building clearance and house searches.
>
For this purpose, why not get an MP-5, in the same caliber as your
pistols? Leave the long gun for outdoor work.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote:
>
> It will be for tactical entry, also building clearance and house searches.
>
For this purpose, why not get an MP-5, in the same caliber as your
pistols? Leave the long gun for outdoor work.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
In article <NDsqe.1248$Ub4.26@fe06.lga>,
"Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote:
>
> It will be for tactical entry, also building clearance and house searches.
>
For this purpose, why not get an MP-5, in the same caliber as your
pistols? Leave the long gun for outdoor work.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote:
>
> It will be for tactical entry, also building clearance and house searches.
>
For this purpose, why not get an MP-5, in the same caliber as your
pistols? Leave the long gun for outdoor work.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
In article <NDsqe.1248$Ub4.26@fe06.lga>,
"Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote:
>
> It will be for tactical entry, also building clearance and house searches.
>
For this purpose, why not get an MP-5, in the same caliber as your
pistols? Leave the long gun for outdoor work.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote:
>
> It will be for tactical entry, also building clearance and house searches.
>
For this purpose, why not get an MP-5, in the same caliber as your
pistols? Leave the long gun for outdoor work.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
a bowling ball better than anything. HA
"Coasty" <uscgret@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ua2dnWg-QJT72jffRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> 30-06 is for light weights get a mans gun
>
>
> http://www.gunsandammomag.com/long_g...86_extralight/
>
> --
> Coasty
> Semper Paratus
> (Always Ready)
>
> "Patrick Ô¿Ô" <patrick.nospam@cityofvarnell.com> wrote in message
> news:yeqqe.17720$mZ2.7652@fe07.lga...
>>I have a feeling either Bill, or Nathan Collier will have good info and a
>>good sugestion, but anyone else is welcome to voice their opinion.
>>
>> I am looking for an AR-15. I have been told by one person that Rock
>> River Arms makes the best AR-15 for the money. He says the RRA is
>> tighter than Bushmaster and Colt. I can get a RRA for the same price as
>> a Bushmaster. Does anyone know if these are as good as he says? I know
>> they make competition pistols that run several thousand dollars, which is
>> more than the quote on the AR. Any info on this matter will be great.
>>
>> Patrick
>> Ô¿Ô
>>
>
>
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
Except it was around right after the Civil War, when everything
else was cap ball muzzle loaded. I sure you see a couple of old westerns
where the Sharps: http://www.emf-company.com/1874-sharps-rifle.htm or
Henry were mentioned:
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/targe...andyhook03.htm
My ROTC training was with an 1903 springfield 30-06, where we could
raised the sight about three inches off the breach:
http://froogle.gunbroker.com/Auction...?Item=32724188
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Rusted wrote:
>
> It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
>
> http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
>
> The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
> less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
> hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
> a bowling ball better than anything. HA
else was cap ball muzzle loaded. I sure you see a couple of old westerns
where the Sharps: http://www.emf-company.com/1874-sharps-rifle.htm or
Henry were mentioned:
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/targe...andyhook03.htm
My ROTC training was with an 1903 springfield 30-06, where we could
raised the sight about three inches off the breach:
http://froogle.gunbroker.com/Auction...?Item=32724188
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Rusted wrote:
>
> It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
>
> http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
>
> The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
> less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
> hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
> a bowling ball better than anything. HA
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
Except it was around right after the Civil War, when everything
else was cap ball muzzle loaded. I sure you see a couple of old westerns
where the Sharps: http://www.emf-company.com/1874-sharps-rifle.htm or
Henry were mentioned:
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/targe...andyhook03.htm
My ROTC training was with an 1903 springfield 30-06, where we could
raised the sight about three inches off the breach:
http://froogle.gunbroker.com/Auction...?Item=32724188
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Rusted wrote:
>
> It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
>
> http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
>
> The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
> less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
> hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
> a bowling ball better than anything. HA
else was cap ball muzzle loaded. I sure you see a couple of old westerns
where the Sharps: http://www.emf-company.com/1874-sharps-rifle.htm or
Henry were mentioned:
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/targe...andyhook03.htm
My ROTC training was with an 1903 springfield 30-06, where we could
raised the sight about three inches off the breach:
http://froogle.gunbroker.com/Auction...?Item=32724188
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Rusted wrote:
>
> It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
>
> http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
>
> The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
> less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
> hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
> a bowling ball better than anything. HA
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Firearms Manufacturer Question
Except it was around right after the Civil War, when everything
else was cap ball muzzle loaded. I sure you see a couple of old westerns
where the Sharps: http://www.emf-company.com/1874-sharps-rifle.htm or
Henry were mentioned:
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/targe...andyhook03.htm
My ROTC training was with an 1903 springfield 30-06, where we could
raised the sight about three inches off the breach:
http://froogle.gunbroker.com/Auction...?Item=32724188
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Rusted wrote:
>
> It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
>
> http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
>
> The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
> less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
> hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
> a bowling ball better than anything. HA
else was cap ball muzzle loaded. I sure you see a couple of old westerns
where the Sharps: http://www.emf-company.com/1874-sharps-rifle.htm or
Henry were mentioned:
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/targe...andyhook03.htm
My ROTC training was with an 1903 springfield 30-06, where we could
raised the sight about three inches off the breach:
http://froogle.gunbroker.com/Auction...?Item=32724188
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Rusted wrote:
>
> It is intereseting to compare the ballistics of teh 45-70 to a 30-06.
>
> http://www.remington.com/ammo/ballistics/ballistics.htm
>
> The good ol '06 has much more energy and velocity than the 45. And much
> less drop. At 500 yards the 45 has dropped 18-25 feet. It sure would be
> hard to hit anything out at that distance. I think the 45 would compare to
> a bowling ball better than anything. HA