Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

So, now you call Ron Hurst of Hurst Racing Tires a liar.

http://www.hurstracingtires.com/1085822.html

Billy, face it. Kid, you are pitiful.

> Anything that would say they were wider than an ordinary tire of a
> 950X14 or 820X15 of about seven inches before 1965 is a pure lie. Look
> how vague this statement from you link: "1960s; a typical slick type
> tire, but engraved with the absolute minimal amount of tread grooves
> required to satisfy legal requirements." nothing is said about cheater
> nor if it's wider than stock.

> "Slick" is another name for liar, Great choice of an anonymous name.

Not any longer.......

I hereby christen you........

Slick Billy

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

So, now you call Ron Hurst of Hurst Racing Tires a liar.

http://www.hurstracingtires.com/1085822.html

Billy, face it. Kid, you are pitiful.

> Anything that would say they were wider than an ordinary tire of a
> 950X14 or 820X15 of about seven inches before 1965 is a pure lie. Look
> how vague this statement from you link: "1960s; a typical slick type
> tire, but engraved with the absolute minimal amount of tread grooves
> required to satisfy legal requirements." nothing is said about cheater
> nor if it's wider than stock.

> "Slick" is another name for liar, Great choice of an anonymous name.

Not any longer.......

I hereby christen you........

Slick Billy

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

> And thanks again, Henry, it's nice that most Groupoids are quite capable of
> thinking!

You are welcome.

Hey, check this site:


http://www.hurstracingtires.com/index.html

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

> And thanks again, Henry, it's nice that most Groupoids are quite capable of
> thinking!

You are welcome.

Hey, check this site:


http://www.hurstracingtires.com/index.html

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

> And thanks again, Henry, it's nice that most Groupoids are quite capable of
> thinking!

You are welcome.

Hey, check this site:


http://www.hurstracingtires.com/index.html

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

And so did I on my Seven, but the year was 1965 for the beginning
of eight inch wide and they were all made with the obvious two inch
spacer rubber in the middle: http://www.----------.com/thunderb.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Henry Bemis wrote:
>
> I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
> door, 348, 3 on the tree.
>
> Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
> there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.
>
> But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
> really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
> picking them so I coulda bought one.
>
> :-)

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

And so did I on my Seven, but the year was 1965 for the beginning
of eight inch wide and they were all made with the obvious two inch
spacer rubber in the middle: http://www.----------.com/thunderb.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Henry Bemis wrote:
>
> I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
> door, 348, 3 on the tree.
>
> Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
> there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.
>
> But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
> really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
> picking them so I coulda bought one.
>
> :-)

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

And so did I on my Seven, but the year was 1965 for the beginning
of eight inch wide and they were all made with the obvious two inch
spacer rubber in the middle: http://www.----------.com/thunderb.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Henry Bemis wrote:
>
> I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
> door, 348, 3 on the tree.
>
> Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
> there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.
>
> But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
> really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
> picking them so I coulda bought one.
>
> :-)

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

Not with the eight inch cheaters.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> In 1961, I take it?
>
> Mother-in-law #1 had a '60 Chev 348, only a 2-speed Slurpomatic, but still
> hauled! And a great looking car, too.....
>
> Yeah, we all really need to archive our entire lives better in case we
> have to prove something to Whatsisname.
>
> SW

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

Not with the eight inch cheaters.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> In 1961, I take it?
>
> Mother-in-law #1 had a '60 Chev 348, only a 2-speed Slurpomatic, but still
> hauled! And a great looking car, too.....
>
> Yeah, we all really need to archive our entire lives better in case we
> have to prove something to Whatsisname.
>
> SW