Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
door, 348, 3 on the tree.

Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.

But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
picking them so I coulda bought one.

:-)

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
door, 348, 3 on the tree.

Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.

But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
picking them so I coulda bought one.

:-)

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
door, 348, 3 on the tree.

Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.

But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
picking them so I coulda bought one.

:-)

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

Bullsh*t! If they were available I would have raced them. Wouldn't
I look silly running Pomona with a 396 Hemi power Altered with these?:
http://www.----------.com/27T.mpg Why do you think the 1959 East meets
West Bakersfield, Garlits was only able to go a hundred and eighty??????
You don't know what you're talking about!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> That's because you are thoroughly stupid, don't you think? (hetorical, of
> course you don't.)
>
> If you had read just 2 lines further, Mr. Googlehead, you would have seen:
>
> "[classified ad -- "Spts, Race, Hot Rods" section] Los Angeles Times; Mar
> 9, 1961; pg. B28, col 2. "CHEV '61 B. A. Hdtp., 350 h.p., 4-spd trans.,
> headers, cheater slicks, 6500 miles, $2850"
>
> Dated early '61, as Henry said.
>
> "This Girl Really Understands Those Customized Cars" [UPI] Ohio |
> Coshocton | The Coshocton Tribune | 1959-05-05 p.2 col 4.
> "Mine is a 1929 model A Ford with a stock chromed grille, a 1958
> Thunderbird engine, three carburetors, a 1949 Ford transmission, a 1948
> Ford differential, a hydraulic trunk lid, a Chevrolet steering system-and
> a few other things like racing slicks (oversized smooth tires) on the
> rear and motorcycle tires on the fronts."
>
> Dated 1959, got that, leadhead? 1959.
>
> So, you lose again.
>
> Anything else new?
>
> Can anyone translate from Billbonics? This ^^^^^ makes no sense at all.......
>

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

Bullsh*t! If they were available I would have raced them. Wouldn't
I look silly running Pomona with a 396 Hemi power Altered with these?:
http://www.----------.com/27T.mpg Why do you think the 1959 East meets
West Bakersfield, Garlits was only able to go a hundred and eighty??????
You don't know what you're talking about!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> That's because you are thoroughly stupid, don't you think? (hetorical, of
> course you don't.)
>
> If you had read just 2 lines further, Mr. Googlehead, you would have seen:
>
> "[classified ad -- "Spts, Race, Hot Rods" section] Los Angeles Times; Mar
> 9, 1961; pg. B28, col 2. "CHEV '61 B. A. Hdtp., 350 h.p., 4-spd trans.,
> headers, cheater slicks, 6500 miles, $2850"
>
> Dated early '61, as Henry said.
>
> "This Girl Really Understands Those Customized Cars" [UPI] Ohio |
> Coshocton | The Coshocton Tribune | 1959-05-05 p.2 col 4.
> "Mine is a 1929 model A Ford with a stock chromed grille, a 1958
> Thunderbird engine, three carburetors, a 1949 Ford transmission, a 1948
> Ford differential, a hydraulic trunk lid, a Chevrolet steering system-and
> a few other things like racing slicks (oversized smooth tires) on the
> rear and motorcycle tires on the fronts."
>
> Dated 1959, got that, leadhead? 1959.
>
> So, you lose again.
>
> Anything else new?
>
> Can anyone translate from Billbonics? This ^^^^^ makes no sense at all.......
>

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

Bullsh*t! If they were available I would have raced them. Wouldn't
I look silly running Pomona with a 396 Hemi power Altered with these?:
http://www.----------.com/27T.mpg Why do you think the 1959 East meets
West Bakersfield, Garlits was only able to go a hundred and eighty??????
You don't know what you're talking about!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

§qu@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> That's because you are thoroughly stupid, don't you think? (hetorical, of
> course you don't.)
>
> If you had read just 2 lines further, Mr. Googlehead, you would have seen:
>
> "[classified ad -- "Spts, Race, Hot Rods" section] Los Angeles Times; Mar
> 9, 1961; pg. B28, col 2. "CHEV '61 B. A. Hdtp., 350 h.p., 4-spd trans.,
> headers, cheater slicks, 6500 miles, $2850"
>
> Dated early '61, as Henry said.
>
> "This Girl Really Understands Those Customized Cars" [UPI] Ohio |
> Coshocton | The Coshocton Tribune | 1959-05-05 p.2 col 4.
> "Mine is a 1929 model A Ford with a stock chromed grille, a 1958
> Thunderbird engine, three carburetors, a 1949 Ford transmission, a 1948
> Ford differential, a hydraulic trunk lid, a Chevrolet steering system-and
> a few other things like racing slicks (oversized smooth tires) on the
> rear and motorcycle tires on the fronts."
>
> Dated 1959, got that, leadhead? 1959.
>
> So, you lose again.
>
> Anything else new?
>
> Can anyone translate from Billbonics? This ^^^^^ makes no sense at all.......
>

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, Henry Bemis wrote:

> I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
> door, 348, 3 on the tree.
>
> Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
> there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.
>
> But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
> really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
> picking them so I coulda bought one.
>
> :-)

In 1961, I take it?

Mother-in-law #1 had a '60 Chev 348, only a 2-speed Slurpomatic, but still
hauled! And a great looking car, too.....

Yeah, we all really need to archive our entire lives better in case we
have to prove something to Whatsisname.


SW


--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"

-- Nancy ------ III

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, Henry Bemis wrote:

> I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
> door, 348, 3 on the tree.
>
> Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
> there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.
>
> But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
> really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
> picking them so I coulda bought one.
>
> :-)

In 1961, I take it?

Mother-in-law #1 had a '60 Chev 348, only a 2-speed Slurpomatic, but still
hauled! And a great looking car, too.....

Yeah, we all really need to archive our entire lives better in case we
have to prove something to Whatsisname.


SW


--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"

-- Nancy ------ III

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, Henry Bemis wrote:

> I had a pair of those recap cheater slicks on my sister's year old 60 Impala 2
> door, 348, 3 on the tree.
>
> Damn - right rear blew the cap off on a smoke filled burnout. Made a mess back
> there. She made me put the original tires back on after that.
>
> But since I didn't have a $700 Intsamatic to take pictures with.....I can't
> really prove it. If they'd have grown avocados here, I could have gotten a job
> picking them so I coulda bought one.
>
> :-)

In 1961, I take it?

Mother-in-law #1 had a '60 Chev 348, only a 2-speed Slurpomatic, but still
hauled! And a great looking car, too.....

Yeah, we all really need to archive our entire lives better in case we
have to prove something to Whatsisname.


SW


--
"Jeeps can get up, and jeeps can also go down. Why can't Bill?"

-- Nancy ------ III

Re: OT: AWESOME!!!
 

So, now you call Ron Hurst of Hurst Racing Tires a liar.

http://www.hurstracingtires.com/1085822.html

Billy, face it. Kid, you are pitiful.

> Anything that would say they were wider than an ordinary tire of a
> 950X14 or 820X15 of about seven inches before 1965 is a pure lie. Look
> how vague this statement from you link: "1960s; a typical slick type
> tire, but engraved with the absolute minimal amount of tread grooves
> required to satisfy legal requirements." nothing is said about cheater
> nor if it's wider than stock.

> "Slick" is another name for liar, Great choice of an anonymous name.

Not any longer.......

I hereby christen you........

Slick Billy