Oil Pressure Hits Zero And Stays There- JGC '96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hi Jeff,
My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
> strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>
> 300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
> strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
> the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
> Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
> and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
> just keep one kind of oil around.
>
> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
> strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>
> 300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
> strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
> the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
> Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
> and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
> just keep one kind of oil around.
>
> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hi Jeff,
My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
> strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>
> 300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
> strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
> the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
> Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
> and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
> just keep one kind of oil around.
>
> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
> strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>
> 300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
> strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
> the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
> Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
> and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
> just keep one kind of oil around.
>
> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Guest
Posts: n/a
Outatime wrote:
>> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>> Jeff DeWitt
>
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
>
I'm hardly a troll... guess I misunderstood this comment from you, is
this some kind of complement I was not previously familiar with?
"The thinking man does not install JUNK PARTS in his Jeep. You do the
math, genius."
Jeff DeWitt
>> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>> Jeff DeWitt
>
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
>
I'm hardly a troll... guess I misunderstood this comment from you, is
this some kind of complement I was not previously familiar with?
"The thinking man does not install JUNK PARTS in his Jeep. You do the
math, genius."
Jeff DeWitt
Guest
Posts: n/a
Outatime wrote:
>> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>> Jeff DeWitt
>
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
>
I'm hardly a troll... guess I misunderstood this comment from you, is
this some kind of complement I was not previously familiar with?
"The thinking man does not install JUNK PARTS in his Jeep. You do the
math, genius."
Jeff DeWitt
>> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>> Jeff DeWitt
>
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
>
I'm hardly a troll... guess I misunderstood this comment from you, is
this some kind of complement I was not previously familiar with?
"The thinking man does not install JUNK PARTS in his Jeep. You do the
math, genius."
Jeff DeWitt
Guest
Posts: n/a
Outatime wrote:
>> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>> Jeff DeWitt
>
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
>
I'm hardly a troll... guess I misunderstood this comment from you, is
this some kind of complement I was not previously familiar with?
"The thinking man does not install JUNK PARTS in his Jeep. You do the
math, genius."
Jeff DeWitt
>> And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>> Jeff DeWitt
>
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
>
I'm hardly a troll... guess I misunderstood this comment from you, is
this some kind of complement I was not previously familiar with?
"The thinking man does not install JUNK PARTS in his Jeep. You do the
math, genius."
Jeff DeWitt
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'd be interested in knowing what engine failure you blame on Fram.
They definitely were the best when spin-ons first appeared in the mid
fifties, their base plate was thicker, enough never to blow off as many
did. Also made them very hard to chisel off if over tightened.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Outatime wrote:
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
They definitely were the best when spin-ons first appeared in the mid
fifties, their base plate was thicker, enough never to blow off as many
did. Also made them very hard to chisel off if over tightened.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Outatime wrote:
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'd be interested in knowing what engine failure you blame on Fram.
They definitely were the best when spin-ons first appeared in the mid
fifties, their base plate was thicker, enough never to blow off as many
did. Also made them very hard to chisel off if over tightened.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Outatime wrote:
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
They definitely were the best when spin-ons first appeared in the mid
fifties, their base plate was thicker, enough never to blow off as many
did. Also made them very hard to chisel off if over tightened.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Outatime wrote:
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'd be interested in knowing what engine failure you blame on Fram.
They definitely were the best when spin-ons first appeared in the mid
fifties, their base plate was thicker, enough never to blow off as many
did. Also made them very hard to chisel off if over tightened.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Outatime wrote:
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
They definitely were the best when spin-ons first appeared in the mid
fifties, their base plate was thicker, enough never to blow off as many
did. Also made them very hard to chisel off if over tightened.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Outatime wrote:
>
> Idiots see insults where none exist.
>
> Troll elsewhere.
Guest
Posts: n/a
That report isn't exactly complementary is it? What did you switch to?
Jeff DeWitt
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
> are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
> filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
> http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
>>I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
>>strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>>
>>300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
>>strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
>>the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
>>Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
>>and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
>>just keep one kind of oil around.
>>
>>And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
Jeff DeWitt
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
> are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
> filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
> http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
>>I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
>>strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>>
>>300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
>>strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
>>the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
>>Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
>>and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
>>just keep one kind of oil around.
>>
>>And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
Guest
Posts: n/a
That report isn't exactly complementary is it? What did you switch to?
Jeff DeWitt
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
> are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
> filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
> http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
>>I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
>>strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>>
>>300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
>>strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
>>the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
>>Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
>>and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
>>just keep one kind of oil around.
>>
>>And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
Jeff DeWitt
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> My 350,000 on my '78 Bronco and 300,000 miles on my '89 Thunderbird
> are on Fram filters and Pennzoil. I did switch to their more expensive
> filters when I found one with a loose element on an oil change:
> http://----------.com/mirror/oilfilterstudy.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
>>I'm not making any big endorsement of Fram products, don't have any
>>strong feelings about them, you shared your experience and I've shared mine.
>>
>>300,000 miles says a lot, I don't see any need to change without some
>>strong evidence that I should. I DID change oil with the new engine,
>>the old one had 300,000 on Penzoil and Fram, the new one has Shell
>>Rotella, partly because from everything I've heard it's excellent oil,
>>and partly because it's what I use in my Studebakers and it's easier to
>>just keep one kind of oil around.
>>
>>And thinking men don't throw out insults with no good reason.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt


