Hey SB...me and you have to figure out what we're going to do about the same
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol


"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>

 

Hey SB...me and you have to figure out what we're going to do about the same
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol


"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>

 

Hey SB...me and you have to figure out what we're going to do about the same
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol


"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:

You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.

> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:

You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.

> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:

You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.

> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:

You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.

> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:37:44 -0400, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:

As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.

>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:37:44 -0400, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:

As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.

>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov

 

On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:37:44 -0400, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:

As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.

>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov

--

Bob C.

Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov