Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
Hey SB...me and you have to figure out what we're going to do about the same
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol
"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol
"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
Hey SB...me and you have to figure out what we're going to do about the same
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol
"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol
"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
Hey SB...me and you have to figure out what we're going to do about the same
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol
"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>
names here....I'm getting confused!! lol
I'm reading your posts and don't even know if I wrote it!! lol
"SB" <mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:dn5pe01uhnbbpflter17iu0i5mtrrla3uh@4ax.com...
> Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
> has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
> What about help for the problem though???
>
> SB
>
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
> >weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> >Bob Casanova wrote:
> >>
> >> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
> >> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
> >> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
> >> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
> >> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
> >> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
> >> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
> >>
> >> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
> >> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
> >> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
> >> your assessment.
> >>
> >> Bob C.
> >>
> >> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
> >> (without the spaces, of course)
> >>
> >> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
> >> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
> >> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
> >> - Isaac Asimov
>
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by L.W.(ßill) ------
III <----------@***.net>:
You're probably right, although they do use different
additive packages for different applications within the same
viscosity range.
> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>
>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>> your assessment.
>>
>> Bob C.
>>
>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:37:44 -0400, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:
As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.
>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:
As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.
>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:37:44 -0400, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:
As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.
>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:
As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.
>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oil pressure drop at idle when engines warm, '96 4.0L JGC
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:37:44 -0400, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:
As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.
>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by SB
<mrwizard@REMOVE.cablespeed.com>:
As for the problem, I'd want to attach a Bourdan-type gauge
to the same point as the electrical sender and verify the
pressure before doing anything else. With a "tee" he can
connect both simultaneously.
>Yea, I've heard the wife's tail before, but I have a '89 honda that
>has 225K miles with about 150K of it on synthetic so....
>
>What about help for the problem though???
>
>SB
>
>On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:23:41 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
><----------@***.net> wrote:
>
>> Nothing, it's the same thing. just refined a little closer to the
>>weights. if it's 5W-30 that's what it is.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>>Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>
>>> What exactly do you think will happen to an engine if you
>>> switch to synthetic (other than decreased wear and less
>>> sludge formation)? Note: The time to start using synthetic
>>> is after the engine is broken in, not when it's new. I'd say
>>> he started a bit late (I generally start at around 20k), but
>>> other than the possibility of increased leakage there's no
>>> danger to the engine; quite the opposite. HTH.
>>>
>>> Sure, but there *are* different formulations of oil for
>>> different operating environments, so there *might* be more
>>> than a marketing ploy here. That said, I tend to agree with
>>> your assessment.
>>>
>>> Bob C.
>>>
>>> Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
>>> (without the spaces, of course)
>>>
>>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>> the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>> 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>>> - Isaac Asimov
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov