Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hi Will,
Yes, I know your year was drilled and tapped, like the Real Jeeps.
It fit your transmission.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> That was what amazed me when I compared the two bell housings. The 88
> actuall had the pivot ball installed on the opposite side from the
> slave mount. The bolt holes were one size too small, but the bosses
> cast into the housings were identical so all it took was drilling and
> re-tapping the mount holes. I've had more trouble mating up parts
> that were supposed to fit than with this. I forget exactly why I used
> the old bell housing when I had the replacement - there had to have
> been a reason but darned if I can rtemember it. Maybe just to see if
> it really did fit.
Yes, I know your year was drilled and tapped, like the Real Jeeps.
It fit your transmission.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> That was what amazed me when I compared the two bell housings. The 88
> actuall had the pivot ball installed on the opposite side from the
> slave mount. The bolt holes were one size too small, but the bosses
> cast into the housings were identical so all it took was drilling and
> re-tapping the mount holes. I've had more trouble mating up parts
> that were supposed to fit than with this. I forget exactly why I used
> the old bell housing when I had the replacement - there had to have
> been a reason but darned if I can rtemember it. Maybe just to see if
> it really did fit.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hi Will,
Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> shaft to match splines.
Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> shaft to match splines.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hi Will,
Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> shaft to match splines.
Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> shaft to match splines.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hi Will,
Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> shaft to match splines.
Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> shaft to match splines.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
too lazy to pull it off again.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Will,
> Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > shaft to match splines.
--
Will Honea
the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
too lazy to pull it off again.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Will,
> Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > shaft to match splines.
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
too lazy to pull it off again.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Will,
> Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > shaft to match splines.
--
Will Honea
the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
too lazy to pull it off again.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Will,
> Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > shaft to match splines.
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
too lazy to pull it off again.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Will,
> Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > shaft to match splines.
--
Will Honea
the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
too lazy to pull it off again.
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Will,
> Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > shaft to match splines.
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Will,
Something does not add up here.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ba10fd.jpg
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ax15f.jpg
Even the number of bolt holes is different. I also found a number of bell
housing pictures on this site. It does look as if you can fit an external
clutch slave to them, although the pictures are not that distinct, and you
can't tell for sure. If you ever want to convert back, someone is selling a
nice BA10 on Ebay, Item 8011677356 ;o).
Earle
"Will Honea" <whonea@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-9gF2hyM7QGpm@anon.none.net...
> Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
> the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
> the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
> mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
> probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
> too lazy to pull it off again.
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> > Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> > is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> > http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > > shaft to match splines.
>
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
Something does not add up here.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ba10fd.jpg
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ax15f.jpg
Even the number of bolt holes is different. I also found a number of bell
housing pictures on this site. It does look as if you can fit an external
clutch slave to them, although the pictures are not that distinct, and you
can't tell for sure. If you ever want to convert back, someone is selling a
nice BA10 on Ebay, Item 8011677356 ;o).
Earle
"Will Honea" <whonea@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-9gF2hyM7QGpm@anon.none.net...
> Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
> the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
> the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
> mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
> probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
> too lazy to pull it off again.
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> > Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> > is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> > http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > > shaft to match splines.
>
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Will,
Something does not add up here.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ba10fd.jpg
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ax15f.jpg
Even the number of bolt holes is different. I also found a number of bell
housing pictures on this site. It does look as if you can fit an external
clutch slave to them, although the pictures are not that distinct, and you
can't tell for sure. If you ever want to convert back, someone is selling a
nice BA10 on Ebay, Item 8011677356 ;o).
Earle
"Will Honea" <whonea@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-9gF2hyM7QGpm@anon.none.net...
> Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
> the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
> the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
> mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
> probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
> too lazy to pull it off again.
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> > Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> > is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> > http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > > shaft to match splines.
>
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
Something does not add up here.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ba10fd.jpg
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ax15f.jpg
Even the number of bolt holes is different. I also found a number of bell
housing pictures on this site. It does look as if you can fit an external
clutch slave to them, although the pictures are not that distinct, and you
can't tell for sure. If you ever want to convert back, someone is selling a
nice BA10 on Ebay, Item 8011677356 ;o).
Earle
"Will Honea" <whonea@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-9gF2hyM7QGpm@anon.none.net...
> Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
> the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
> the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
> mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
> probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
> too lazy to pull it off again.
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> > Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> > is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> > http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > > shaft to match splines.
>
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
Will,
Something does not add up here.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ba10fd.jpg
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ax15f.jpg
Even the number of bolt holes is different. I also found a number of bell
housing pictures on this site. It does look as if you can fit an external
clutch slave to them, although the pictures are not that distinct, and you
can't tell for sure. If you ever want to convert back, someone is selling a
nice BA10 on Ebay, Item 8011677356 ;o).
Earle
"Will Honea" <whonea@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-9gF2hyM7QGpm@anon.none.net...
> Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
> the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
> the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
> mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
> probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
> too lazy to pull it off again.
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> > Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> > is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> > http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > > shaft to match splines.
>
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
Something does not add up here.
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ba10fd.jpg
http://www.off-road.com/jeep/tech/trans/ax15f.jpg
Even the number of bolt holes is different. I also found a number of bell
housing pictures on this site. It does look as if you can fit an external
clutch slave to them, although the pictures are not that distinct, and you
can't tell for sure. If you ever want to convert back, someone is selling a
nice BA10 on Ebay, Item 8011677356 ;o).
Earle
"Will Honea" <whonea@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-9gF2hyM7QGpm@anon.none.net...
> Hard to see the exact difference in the photo, Bill, but the AX-15 fit
> the same bolt holes as the BA 10/5. The ones I had to fix were just
> the two bolts for the slave cylinder. I know I had both bellhousings
> mated to the AX-15 just to see if I was seeing straight. That's
> probably why I used the old one - had it on the transmission and was
> too lazy to pull it off again.
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 03:13:23 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> <----------@***.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Will,
> > Then you had to have changed bellhousings, look at the way the AX-15
> > is bolted to it, which won't even fit the AX-5 setting to our left:
> > http://www.----------.com/ax5_ax15.jpg
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd say it probably is - I went from the frog POS to an AX-15 and the
> > > clutch change was just a bonus project while I had it apart. I had
> > > more grief with the cross member and rear mount than anything else -
> > > the 94 Wrangler AX-15 went right in and even came with the tc input
> > > shaft to match splines.
>
>
> --
> Will Honea
>
