Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.

I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.

Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???

Capt. Purple

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Just think one more year and the slave will move outside the
bellhousing.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Captain Purple wrote:
>
> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Just think one more year and the slave will move outside the
bellhousing.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Captain Purple wrote:
>
> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Just think one more year and the slave will move outside the
bellhousing.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Captain Purple wrote:
>
> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Convert it to external slave.

Captain Purple wrote:

> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple
>
>

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Convert it to external slave.

Captain Purple wrote:

> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple
>
>

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

Convert it to external slave.

Captain Purple wrote:

> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple
>
>

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

I much prefer the mechanical linkage like the CJ7 has. If I was going
to do a conversion, that is what I would go for.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

Captain Purple wrote:
>
> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

I much prefer the mechanical linkage like the CJ7 has. If I was going
to do a conversion, that is what I would go for.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

Captain Purple wrote:
>
> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple

Re: Oh, no! Not the bad clutch slave again !
 

I much prefer the mechanical linkage like the CJ7 has. If I was going
to do a conversion, that is what I would go for.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

Captain Purple wrote:
>
> Here we go again. Am I crazy or what? (don't answer that.) On the jeeps I've owned there have been MANY
> repairs to the clutch hydraulic slave cylinders. I have been told repeatedly by different people that this is
> a thorn in the side and to more or less live with it.
>
> I'd MUCH rather put the money into other goodies, new tires, etc etc etc rather than having these things fixed
> every 6-7 months for years, all with different 91, 92, 93, 94 std transmission vehicles.
>
> Just venting. Could always be worse. Is this as common as I'm told???
>
> Capt. Purple