O.T. Red light camera
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dean did pass the time by typing:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
>
>> Sorry bout that.
>> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
>> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
>> regards
>> Frank
>
> Frank,
>
> I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
too good for a redlight cam.
--
DougW
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
>
>> Sorry bout that.
>> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
>> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
>> regards
>> Frank
>
> Frank,
>
> I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
too good for a redlight cam.
--
DougW
Guest
Posts: n/a
No, it's absolutly real. The guy that got hit is fine.
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
No, it's absolutly real. The guy that got hit is fine.
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
No, it's absolutly real. The guy that got hit is fine.
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
No, it's absolutly real. The guy that got hit is fine.
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Nick
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:WwIJc.7514$SD3.7419@okepread06...
> Dean did pass the time by typing:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:21:12 -0400, FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry bout that.
> >> Didn't mean to offend anyone.
> >> Again sorry. Wont do it again.
> >> regards
> >> Frank
> >
> > Frank,
> >
> > I wasn't offended so much as surprised. Hadn't even had my first cup of
> > coffee and blam some poor guy gets badly hurt.
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
According to Snopes.com, it is real.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
According to Snopes.com, it is real.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
According to Snopes.com, it is real.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
According to Snopes.com, it is real.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
Tom
>
> I wonder if it isn't actually a real good photoshopping. That's almost
> too good for a redlight cam.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
mabar did pass the time by typing:
> According to Snopes.com, it is real.
>
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
In that case..
owtch!
--
DougW
> According to Snopes.com, it is real.
>
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/carcrash01.asp
In that case..
owtch!
--
DougW


