O.T. Red light camera
#161
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
www.consumptionjunction.com
always a favorite.
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r4TJc.12738$kK.7116@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> "http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/poke.php"
> LMAO
>
> I know www.rotten.com... I can't even click on it anymore...
always a favorite.
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:r4TJc.12738$kK.7116@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> "http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/poke.php"
> LMAO
>
> I know www.rotten.com... I can't even click on it anymore...
#162
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
Uh, no. The driver in the video is off the road, for one. And you? After
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
#163
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
Uh, no. The driver in the video is off the road, for one. And you? After
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
#164
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
Uh, no. The driver in the video is off the road, for one. And you? After
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
#165
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
Uh, no. The driver in the video is off the road, for one. And you? After
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
you get caught and gonna pay, are you more aware of your driving and am
gonna do it more carefully, or are ya gonna say screw it and keep driving
crazy and paying your fines, eventually losing your liscense?
Nick
"Jim85CJ" <jim_85cj@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:QsVJc.13300$kK.2827@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
> This video proves that these cameras don't prevent accidents or slow
> people down... they just increase revenue.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's just that's the figure the revenue enhancing
> > people like, like for parking in front of my home.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > DougW wrote:
> >
> >>That's cheap. If it were up to me I'd at least double that.
> >>Got to wonder why folks are in such a rush to die.
>
#166
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:38:55 -0600, "Kevin S." <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
#167
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:38:55 -0600, "Kevin S." <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
#168
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:38:55 -0600, "Kevin S." <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
#169
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. Red light camera
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:38:55 -0600, "Kevin S." <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com>
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
wrote:
>And all I ask for is personal accountability, something that is lacking
>these days.
Geez Kev, you seem to be much more upset over my little post than really seams
reasonable. I agree, be accountable for your posts.
> It's kind of like running through a freshly mopped floor and
>then being surprised when you fall down and get hurt.
This is not really applicable in this case. Its more like Mike Romain's request
that people differentiate between For Sale vs For Auction. His chances of
getting that are about as likely as me getting my request. But, if I ever have
anything on auction this group might be interested in I'll put FA in the
subject. It's not hard to be civil and that is truly what is missing these
days.
>All I was trying to do was point out the obvious:
Just a reminder here is the entirety of the original post:
Ouch!
Check this out
http://www.analog-innovations.com/Mu...ightCamera.mpg
>The thread was marked OT - your first chance not to read it
I like to read off topic threads. I sometimes wish there would be more of them,
(well that's not entirely true <g>). This group has a lot of experience in many
things beyond just Jeeps. More than once I've wanted to start a thread about a
non-jeeping issue or problem. I don't because that would not be appropriate for
this group. That said I still read others' off topic posts.
>It was named Red Light Camera - Hmmmmm what could it be?
I don't know, what could it be? A fender bender? Somebody getting pulled over
for a ticket?
>The first word was OUCH! - Maybe a reference to pain?
I say ouch when I stub my toe. I also say ouch when I add a new dent to my
Jeep. I think serous injury would have been more appropriate.
>The link was to a video - so put together, we have "Red Light", "Pain", and
>a video
OK so maybe I didn't have enough coffee yet. <lol> And to be honest I can't
remember anything in this group that was offensive, <humor> except maybe that
long drawn out thread about diesel volkswagens. (but that is another
off-topic.) </humor> So maybe I shouldn't have posted my request. SO Kev there
is my personal accountability.
<snipped a bunch of childishness>
Where's yours for being a jerk?
Dean
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeepster94
Jeep & 4x4 Vehicles for sale
0
11-18-2012 04:40 PM
jeep videos
Jeep Videos - Pictures
0
04-21-2008 05:23 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)