O.T. meteor
10-04-2005, 08:48 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Just know that could send you Melissa:
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/ven...sa.u.gen1.html and
you don't even have to open it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Brandonb wrote:
>
> Neither does Lynx, but I don't see many people still using that archaic
> browser. I used to use 4.78..... about 3-4 years ago.
>
> Brandonb
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/ven...sa.u.gen1.html and
you don't even have to open it.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Brandonb wrote:
>
> Neither does Lynx, but I don't see many people still using that archaic
> browser. I used to use 4.78..... about 3-4 years ago.
>
> Brandonb
10-04-2005, 08:48 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
....but do you really want AOL instant messaging (installs by default
with 4.7x.)
I've been a Moz fan for nearly since there was Mozilla. We use 4.5x then
4.7x for email at work (~50 workstations) and up until last year, also
for browsing.
When NS7.x came out we switched to the bloat free version at
sillydog.com. No AIM, Quality feedback agent, and other crap you don't need.
Been using Thunderbird and Firefox lately and gotta say it's sweet. With
TB you can have Multiple email accounts to every different POP you want,
all the newsservers you can use, with as many different nic's you want
all on the front page. No need to switch profiles like you do with
Outa'luck.
And can't beat Fx and tabbed browsing for not getting lost when you go
off chasing a link... No more 20 dozen Internet Exploiter windows open
all over your Taskbar.
ymmv...
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
> it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>
>>So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
>>headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>>
>>I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
>>Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
>>does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
>>recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
>>less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
>>security and privacy settings in check and not set to
>>"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
>>course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
>>more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>>
>>Brandonb
with 4.7x.)
I've been a Moz fan for nearly since there was Mozilla. We use 4.5x then
4.7x for email at work (~50 workstations) and up until last year, also
for browsing.
When NS7.x came out we switched to the bloat free version at
sillydog.com. No AIM, Quality feedback agent, and other crap you don't need.
Been using Thunderbird and Firefox lately and gotta say it's sweet. With
TB you can have Multiple email accounts to every different POP you want,
all the newsservers you can use, with as many different nic's you want
all on the front page. No need to switch profiles like you do with
Outa'luck.
And can't beat Fx and tabbed browsing for not getting lost when you go
off chasing a link... No more 20 dozen Internet Exploiter windows open
all over your Taskbar.
ymmv...
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
> it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>
>>So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
>>headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>>
>>I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
>>Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
>>does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
>>recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
>>less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
>>security and privacy settings in check and not set to
>>"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
>>course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
>>more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>>
>>Brandonb
10-04-2005, 08:48 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
....but do you really want AOL instant messaging (installs by default
with 4.7x.)
I've been a Moz fan for nearly since there was Mozilla. We use 4.5x then
4.7x for email at work (~50 workstations) and up until last year, also
for browsing.
When NS7.x came out we switched to the bloat free version at
sillydog.com. No AIM, Quality feedback agent, and other crap you don't need.
Been using Thunderbird and Firefox lately and gotta say it's sweet. With
TB you can have Multiple email accounts to every different POP you want,
all the newsservers you can use, with as many different nic's you want
all on the front page. No need to switch profiles like you do with
Outa'luck.
And can't beat Fx and tabbed browsing for not getting lost when you go
off chasing a link... No more 20 dozen Internet Exploiter windows open
all over your Taskbar.
ymmv...
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
> it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>
>>So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
>>headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>>
>>I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
>>Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
>>does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
>>recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
>>less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
>>security and privacy settings in check and not set to
>>"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
>>course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
>>more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>>
>>Brandonb
with 4.7x.)
I've been a Moz fan for nearly since there was Mozilla. We use 4.5x then
4.7x for email at work (~50 workstations) and up until last year, also
for browsing.
When NS7.x came out we switched to the bloat free version at
sillydog.com. No AIM, Quality feedback agent, and other crap you don't need.
Been using Thunderbird and Firefox lately and gotta say it's sweet. With
TB you can have Multiple email accounts to every different POP you want,
all the newsservers you can use, with as many different nic's you want
all on the front page. No need to switch profiles like you do with
Outa'luck.
And can't beat Fx and tabbed browsing for not getting lost when you go
off chasing a link... No more 20 dozen Internet Exploiter windows open
all over your Taskbar.
ymmv...
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
> it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>
>>So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
>>headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>>
>>I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
>>Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
>>does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
>>recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
>>less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
>>security and privacy settings in check and not set to
>>"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
>>course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
>>more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>>
>>Brandonb
10-04-2005, 08:48 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
....but do you really want AOL instant messaging (installs by default
with 4.7x.)
I've been a Moz fan for nearly since there was Mozilla. We use 4.5x then
4.7x for email at work (~50 workstations) and up until last year, also
for browsing.
When NS7.x came out we switched to the bloat free version at
sillydog.com. No AIM, Quality feedback agent, and other crap you don't need.
Been using Thunderbird and Firefox lately and gotta say it's sweet. With
TB you can have Multiple email accounts to every different POP you want,
all the newsservers you can use, with as many different nic's you want
all on the front page. No need to switch profiles like you do with
Outa'luck.
And can't beat Fx and tabbed browsing for not getting lost when you go
off chasing a link... No more 20 dozen Internet Exploiter windows open
all over your Taskbar.
ymmv...
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
> it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>
>>So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
>>headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>>
>>I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
>>Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
>>does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
>>recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
>>less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
>>security and privacy settings in check and not set to
>>"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
>>course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
>>more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>>
>>Brandonb
with 4.7x.)
I've been a Moz fan for nearly since there was Mozilla. We use 4.5x then
4.7x for email at work (~50 workstations) and up until last year, also
for browsing.
When NS7.x came out we switched to the bloat free version at
sillydog.com. No AIM, Quality feedback agent, and other crap you don't need.
Been using Thunderbird and Firefox lately and gotta say it's sweet. With
TB you can have Multiple email accounts to every different POP you want,
all the newsservers you can use, with as many different nic's you want
all on the front page. No need to switch profiles like you do with
Outa'luck.
And can't beat Fx and tabbed browsing for not getting lost when you go
off chasing a link... No more 20 dozen Internet Exploiter windows open
all over your Taskbar.
ymmv...
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
> it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>
>>So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
>>headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>>
>>I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
>>Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
>>does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
>>recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
>>less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
>>security and privacy settings in check and not set to
>>"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
>>course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
>>more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>>
>>Brandonb
10-04-2005, 09:12 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
I have AdAware and SpyBot. The one will catch things the other misses
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4342F567.E61290D2@***.net...
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>>
>> Or you just need to upgrade beyond 4.79 :) Firefox handles it fine as
>> did 7.1.
>>
>> Brandonb
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4342F567.E61290D2@***.net...
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>>
>> Or you just need to upgrade beyond 4.79 :) Firefox handles it fine as
>> did 7.1.
>>
>> Brandonb
10-04-2005, 09:12 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
I have AdAware and SpyBot. The one will catch things the other misses
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4342F567.E61290D2@***.net...
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>>
>> Or you just need to upgrade beyond 4.79 :) Firefox handles it fine as
>> did 7.1.
>>
>> Brandonb
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4342F567.E61290D2@***.net...
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>>
>> Or you just need to upgrade beyond 4.79 :) Firefox handles it fine as
>> did 7.1.
>>
>> Brandonb
10-04-2005, 09:12 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
I have AdAware and SpyBot. The one will catch things the other misses
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4342F567.E61290D2@***.net...
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>>
>> Or you just need to upgrade beyond 4.79 :) Firefox handles it fine as
>> did 7.1.
>>
>> Brandonb
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4342F567.E61290D2@***.net...
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Brandonb wrote:
>>
>> Or you just need to upgrade beyond 4.79 :) Firefox handles it fine as
>> did 7.1.
>>
>> Brandonb
10-05-2005, 12:05 AM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4342C1B6.66647282@sympatico.ca...
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
If microcrap will handle it but Netscape will not, what does that say about
Netscape??
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>>
>> Too funny had to share
>>
>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
10-05-2005, 12:05 AM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4342C1B6.66647282@sympatico.ca...
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
If microcrap will handle it but Netscape will not, what does that say about
Netscape??
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>>
>> Too funny had to share
>>
>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
10-05-2005, 12:05 AM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4342C1B6.66647282@sympatico.ca...
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
If microcrap will handle it but Netscape will not, what does that say about
Netscape??
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>>
>> Too funny had to share
>>
>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322