O.T. meteor
10-04-2005, 05:37 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Mike Romain wrote:
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Too funny had to share
>>
>>http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Works in Netscape for me ...
- JJ
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Too funny had to share
>>
>>http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Works in Netscape for me ...
- JJ
10-04-2005, 05:37 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Mike Romain wrote:
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Too funny had to share
>>
>>http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Works in Netscape for me ...
- JJ
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Too funny had to share
>>
>>http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Works in Netscape for me ...
- JJ
10-04-2005, 05:37 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Mike Romain wrote:
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Too funny had to share
>>
>>http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Works in Netscape for me ...
- JJ
> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>>Too funny had to share
>>
>>http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
Works in Netscape for me ...
- JJ
10-04-2005, 05:54 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Keep YerSpam did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>> FrankW wrote:
>>
>>> Too funny had to share
>>>
>>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
>
> Works in Netscape for me ...
works in firefox 1.5b1 :)
--
DougW
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>> FrankW wrote:
>>
>>> Too funny had to share
>>>
>>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
>
> Works in Netscape for me ...
works in firefox 1.5b1 :)
--
DougW
10-04-2005, 05:54 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Keep YerSpam did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>> FrankW wrote:
>>
>>> Too funny had to share
>>>
>>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
>
> Works in Netscape for me ...
works in firefox 1.5b1 :)
--
DougW
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>> FrankW wrote:
>>
>>> Too funny had to share
>>>
>>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
>
> Works in Netscape for me ...
works in firefox 1.5b1 :)
--
DougW
10-04-2005, 05:54 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Keep YerSpam did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>> FrankW wrote:
>>
>>> Too funny had to share
>>>
>>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
>
> Works in Netscape for me ...
works in firefox 1.5b1 :)
--
DougW
> Mike Romain wrote:
>> The below site will crash Netscape, it must be for microcrap users only.
>> FrankW wrote:
>>
>>> Too funny had to share
>>>
>>> http://www.killsometime.com/Video/video.asp?ID=322
>
> Works in Netscape for me ...
works in firefox 1.5b1 :)
--
DougW
10-04-2005, 06:26 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
security and privacy settings in check and not set to
"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
Brandonb
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
security and privacy settings in check and not set to
"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
Brandonb
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
10-04-2005, 06:26 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
security and privacy settings in check and not set to
"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
Brandonb
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
security and privacy settings in check and not set to
"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
Brandonb
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
10-04-2005, 06:26 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
security and privacy settings in check and not set to
"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
Brandonb
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
security and privacy settings in check and not set to
"wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
Brandonb
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Mike and me don't like cleaning our machines from the spy ware
> maliciously installed by the Java capable browsers from this type of
> site: http://www.----------.com/temp/browsers.jpg You might run:
> http://www.tucows.com/preview/236049 and see if they are coping your
> bank PIN with resister keys.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
10-04-2005, 08:21 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: O.T. meteor
Try 4.78: http://wp.netscape.com/download/sd_cc32d478en.html What
it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Brandonb wrote:
>
> So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
> headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>
> I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
> Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
> does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
> recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
> less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
> security and privacy settings in check and not set to
> "wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
> course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
> more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>
> Brandonb
it doesn't download you don't want on your machine.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Brandonb wrote:
>
> So you use one that is shown in that picture (4.78 according you your
> headers)? Seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?
>
> I also use Firefox/Thunderbird at home where I've got Spybot S&D and
> Ad-Aware SE and update and run them occasionally just to see if anything
> does appear, but invariably nothing does. Sure they're not perfect as
> recent news has reported, but I kep them updated and there are still far
> less security problems on a whole than IE. It also helps to keep the
> security and privacy settings in check and not set to
> "wide-open-so-all-the-baddies-on-the-Internet-can-rape-me". But of
> course, that goes for any browser you use on any platform. Some are just
> more susceptible than others, sometimes by a large margin.
>
> Brandonb