NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
to oranges.
--
Coasty
Remove the SPOOGE to reply
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4359883A.365A96BB@***.net...
> Basically would "you" call a Cadillac or Olds, puny? It diffidently
> wouldn't have the TJ's first gear in it:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Coasty wrote:
>>
>> "PUNY" by itself is subjective much as an asumption and there fore has no
>> true meaning except by the "PUNYER"
>>
>> --
>> Coasty
to oranges.
--
Coasty
Remove the SPOOGE to reply
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4359883A.365A96BB@***.net...
> Basically would "you" call a Cadillac or Olds, puny? It diffidently
> wouldn't have the TJ's first gear in it:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Coasty wrote:
>>
>> "PUNY" by itself is subjective much as an asumption and there fore has no
>> true meaning except by the "PUNYER"
>>
>> --
>> Coasty
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
to oranges.
--
Coasty
Remove the SPOOGE to reply
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4359883A.365A96BB@***.net...
> Basically would "you" call a Cadillac or Olds, puny? It diffidently
> wouldn't have the TJ's first gear in it:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Coasty wrote:
>>
>> "PUNY" by itself is subjective much as an asumption and there fore has no
>> true meaning except by the "PUNYER"
>>
>> --
>> Coasty
to oranges.
--
Coasty
Remove the SPOOGE to reply
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4359883A.365A96BB@***.net...
> Basically would "you" call a Cadillac or Olds, puny? It diffidently
> wouldn't have the TJ's first gear in it:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Coasty wrote:
>>
>> "PUNY" by itself is subjective much as an asumption and there fore has no
>> true meaning except by the "PUNYER"
>>
>> --
>> Coasty
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
to oranges.
--
Coasty
Remove the SPOOGE to reply
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4359883A.365A96BB@***.net...
> Basically would "you" call a Cadillac or Olds, puny? It diffidently
> wouldn't have the TJ's first gear in it:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Coasty wrote:
>>
>> "PUNY" by itself is subjective much as an asumption and there fore has no
>> true meaning except by the "PUNYER"
>>
>> --
>> Coasty
to oranges.
--
Coasty
Remove the SPOOGE to reply
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4359883A.365A96BB@***.net...
> Basically would "you" call a Cadillac or Olds, puny? It diffidently
> wouldn't have the TJ's first gear in it:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Coasty wrote:
>>
>> "PUNY" by itself is subjective much as an asumption and there fore has no
>> true meaning except by the "PUNYER"
>>
>> --
>> Coasty
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
Right, they wouldn't have had a POS transmission in them for sure:
http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg Transmissions in them like GM
Turbo, Muncie, Borg-Warner, Fuller, Eaton, and Dana.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Coasty wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
> to oranges.
>
> --
> Coasty
http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg Transmissions in them like GM
Turbo, Muncie, Borg-Warner, Fuller, Eaton, and Dana.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Coasty wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
> to oranges.
>
> --
> Coasty
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
Right, they wouldn't have had a POS transmission in them for sure:
http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg Transmissions in them like GM
Turbo, Muncie, Borg-Warner, Fuller, Eaton, and Dana.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Coasty wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
> to oranges.
>
> --
> Coasty
http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg Transmissions in them like GM
Turbo, Muncie, Borg-Warner, Fuller, Eaton, and Dana.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Coasty wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
> to oranges.
>
> --
> Coasty
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
Right, they wouldn't have had a POS transmission in them for sure:
http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg Transmissions in them like GM
Turbo, Muncie, Borg-Warner, Fuller, Eaton, and Dana.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Coasty wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
> to oranges.
>
> --
> Coasty
http://www.----------.com/temp/nv3550.jpg Transmissions in them like GM
Turbo, Muncie, Borg-Warner, Fuller, Eaton, and Dana.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Coasty wrote:
>
> I wouldn't call them anything, they are different you cannot compare apples
> to oranges.
>
> --
> Coasty
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NV3550 first gear failure. Need opinions.
Bill,
You asked Coasty, "You ever hear of a full size Bronco with a stick?"
earlier in this thread. When I replied, I should have replied, "Yes, I have,
I know someone who had one". I should not has said it was a 5-speed, I don't
know what it was, but it was a MANUAL TRANSMISSION. It's entirly possible it
was a 5-speed, since it MAY have been an '89 (I remember it was the second
body style for the FS Bronco and it did have a V8), and 5sp manual was
introduced in '88:
http://www.off-road.com/ford/bigbroncos/faq.html
But in fact I am not sure, he sold it a couple years ago.
You can spout off on those Pearl-Harbor-bombers all you want about it, but
like it or not, there it is. I guess you'll have to admit the FS Bronco
wasn't a "real truck" after all.
What do front wheel drive cars have to do with fullsize Broncos? Nothing,
except in your mind. Off on one of your pathetic tangents. Time to adjust
the meds again. http://----------.com/vicodin.jpg
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43595F06.B5370C9A@***.net...
> Then in your inexperience you assumed WRONG. As the Japanese puny
> five speeds didn't come until later. Like the Real trucks had Real
> transmissions and they were only four speeds because we had Real V8s.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> I never said what kind of 5 speed it had....I did say 5 speed but I
>> assumed
>> as much. It was manual. Never attempted to guess what model.
You asked Coasty, "You ever hear of a full size Bronco with a stick?"
earlier in this thread. When I replied, I should have replied, "Yes, I have,
I know someone who had one". I should not has said it was a 5-speed, I don't
know what it was, but it was a MANUAL TRANSMISSION. It's entirly possible it
was a 5-speed, since it MAY have been an '89 (I remember it was the second
body style for the FS Bronco and it did have a V8), and 5sp manual was
introduced in '88:
http://www.off-road.com/ford/bigbroncos/faq.html
But in fact I am not sure, he sold it a couple years ago.
You can spout off on those Pearl-Harbor-bombers all you want about it, but
like it or not, there it is. I guess you'll have to admit the FS Bronco
wasn't a "real truck" after all.
What do front wheel drive cars have to do with fullsize Broncos? Nothing,
except in your mind. Off on one of your pathetic tangents. Time to adjust
the meds again. http://----------.com/vicodin.jpg
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43595F06.B5370C9A@***.net...
> Then in your inexperience you assumed WRONG. As the Japanese puny
> five speeds didn't come until later. Like the Real trucks had Real
> transmissions and they were only four speeds because we had Real V8s.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> I never said what kind of 5 speed it had....I did say 5 speed but I
>> assumed
>> as much. It was manual. Never attempted to guess what model.