Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <4254C24B.675504B7@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> I believe everyone else here, that may be interested, read from the
>sites I provided.
So your claim, as quoted here:
> Geez, they stopped using the Exhaust Gases Recycling valve twenty
>years ago.
Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> LMAO. Where do you get your information?
> I believe everyone else here, that may be interested, read from the
>sites I provided.
So your claim, as quoted here:
> Geez, they stopped using the Exhaust Gases Recycling valve twenty
>years ago.
Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> LMAO. Where do you get your information?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
In message <4254C24B.675504B7@***.net>, "L.W." wrote:
> I believe everyone else here, that may be interested, read from the
>sites I provided.
So your claim, as quoted here:
> Geez, they stopped using the Exhaust Gases Recycling valve twenty
>years ago.
Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> LMAO. Where do you get your information?
> I believe everyone else here, that may be interested, read from the
>sites I provided.
So your claim, as quoted here:
> Geez, they stopped using the Exhaust Gases Recycling valve twenty
>years ago.
Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>bllsht wrote:
>>
>> LMAO. Where do you get your information?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
You know the sites were on the previous post. I must sound like a
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
broken record, trying to beat it into backwards mind.
And my full-sized Bronco weights less than your wannabee.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
bllsht wrote:
>
> So your claim, as quoted here:
>
> Is from one of the sites you posted here? I must have missed that one. LOL!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
<snip>
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
<snip>
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
<snip>
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Nutter Bypass Ignition Modification???
<snip>
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >> >> >> >> >Bad guess there bllsht, we have compared paperwork with california folks
> >> >> >> >> >online several times and we have higher standards here.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --------. Even the NOx pass/fail cut points you posted here were more than
> >> >> >> >> twice what California's are.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Give it up, every time you post this crap we break out our paperwork
> >> >> >> >that says different.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The fact is you can't prove your claim because it's not true.
> >> >> >
> >> My first post in this thread said the OP would fail for NOx in California, where
> >> he is, if he lived where loaded mode testing is done.
> >
> >My friend Norm Mitchell who posts here now and then has a Nuttered (by
> >me) 89 YJ that 'has' to pass all the emissions including NOx.
> >
> >On his test he got 1500 for NOx in Toronto Canada.
> >
> >Bill ------ is allowed 2139 IN CALIFORNIA!!!!!
>
> Once again, you're comparing Bill's 1978, 6400lb GVW vehicle to a 1989, 4000lb
> GVW vehicle. I guess it's just too much to ask of your poor little brain.
>
Too funny, you are the 'foole' that keeps saying no way can the Nutter
pass NOx and I just proved you wrong.
There are a 'lot' of Nuttered jobs out there that I personally know
about and we all have passed emissions.
Oh by the by, a YJ has a way higher GVW than 4000 lb, even the old CJ7
has a GVW of 4450.....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's