Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   NP231 to NP241 Swap (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/np231-np241-swap-7711/)

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 11-23-2003 05:12 PM

Re: NP231 to NP241 Swap
 
Damn right!
http://piction1.awm.gov.au/pls/picti...ps_what=screen
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> A real Jeeper would have done the swap while the shiny side was
> downwards.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 11-23-2003 05:12 PM

Re: NP231 to NP241 Swap
 
Damn right!
http://piction1.awm.gov.au/pls/picti...ps_what=screen
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> A real Jeeper would have done the swap while the shiny side was
> downwards.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 11-23-2003 05:12 PM

Re: NP231 to NP241 Swap
 
Damn right!
http://piction1.awm.gov.au/pls/picti...ps_what=screen
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lon Stowell wrote:
>
> A real Jeeper would have done the swap while the shiny side was
> downwards.
>
> --
> Still a Raiders fan, but no longer sure why.


Will Honea 11-23-2003 06:00 PM

Re: NP231 to NP241 Swap
 
Well, if it turns out the way I think it will and you wind up with an
unusably short drive shaft, you could send the 241 to me to use under
my MJ - I got lots of room with the 122 inch wheelbase <g>. I'm not
sure but I think the difference is about 2 inches - which is
significant with the YJ.

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:44:11 UTC "gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net>
wrote:

> Opps forgot that. It was going to under my 94YJ. That came to a screeching
> halt Friday night after I flipped mine. Now I get to spend my time putting
> everything back together before going to Gray Rock this coming weekend.
>
> chris d.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Will Honea" <whonea@codenet.net> wrote in message
> news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-RszufzfSywkH@anon.none.net...
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:52:11 UTC "gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have the chance to get my hands on a NP241 transfer case from a Chevy
> > > manual tranny. Will this transfer case work in place of my NP231? I

> heard
> > > or read somewhere that the 241 is stouter than the 231. Can anyone

> verify
> > > this

> >
> > The 241 is rated at a little less torque but it's basically
> > comparable. The real issue you will have is the length: the 241 is
> > longer so you'll need a rear driveshaft change as well, which may be a
> > real problem if this is a YJ/TJ (you don't say). The front shaft will
> > be fine.
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>

>
>



--
Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>

Will Honea 11-23-2003 06:00 PM

Re: NP231 to NP241 Swap
 
Well, if it turns out the way I think it will and you wind up with an
unusably short drive shaft, you could send the 241 to me to use under
my MJ - I got lots of room with the 122 inch wheelbase <g>. I'm not
sure but I think the difference is about 2 inches - which is
significant with the YJ.

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:44:11 UTC "gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net>
wrote:

> Opps forgot that. It was going to under my 94YJ. That came to a screeching
> halt Friday night after I flipped mine. Now I get to spend my time putting
> everything back together before going to Gray Rock this coming weekend.
>
> chris d.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Will Honea" <whonea@codenet.net> wrote in message
> news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-RszufzfSywkH@anon.none.net...
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:52:11 UTC "gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have the chance to get my hands on a NP241 transfer case from a Chevy
> > > manual tranny. Will this transfer case work in place of my NP231? I

> heard
> > > or read somewhere that the 241 is stouter than the 231. Can anyone

> verify
> > > this

> >
> > The 241 is rated at a little less torque but it's basically
> > comparable. The real issue you will have is the length: the 241 is
> > longer so you'll need a rear driveshaft change as well, which may be a
> > real problem if this is a YJ/TJ (you don't say). The front shaft will
> > be fine.
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>

>
>



--
Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>

Will Honea 11-23-2003 06:00 PM

Re: NP231 to NP241 Swap
 
Well, if it turns out the way I think it will and you wind up with an
unusably short drive shaft, you could send the 241 to me to use under
my MJ - I got lots of room with the 122 inch wheelbase <g>. I'm not
sure but I think the difference is about 2 inches - which is
significant with the YJ.

On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:44:11 UTC "gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net>
wrote:

> Opps forgot that. It was going to under my 94YJ. That came to a screeching
> halt Friday night after I flipped mine. Now I get to spend my time putting
> everything back together before going to Gray Rock this coming weekend.
>
> chris d.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Will Honea" <whonea@codenet.net> wrote in message
> news:JxX2tWiP5BNp-pn2-RszufzfSywkH@anon.none.net...
> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:52:11 UTC "gosling1" <jduchock@bellsout.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have the chance to get my hands on a NP241 transfer case from a Chevy
> > > manual tranny. Will this transfer case work in place of my NP231? I

> heard
> > > or read somewhere that the 241 is stouter than the 231. Can anyone

> verify
> > > this

> >
> > The 241 is rated at a little less torque but it's basically
> > comparable. The real issue you will have is the length: the 241 is
> > longer so you'll need a rear driveshaft change as well, which may be a
> > real problem if this is a YJ/TJ (you don't say). The front shaft will
> > be fine.
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>

>
>



--
Will Honea <whonea@codenet.net>


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.04247 seconds with 8 queries