The United States of American may have won the battles, but we lost
World War II.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

 

That and the State of Kalifornia makes anything built before 1976
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

 

That and the State of Kalifornia makes anything built before 1976
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

 

That and the State of Kalifornia makes anything built before 1976
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

 

billy ray wrote:
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>

Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.

What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."

Jeff DeWitt

 

billy ray wrote:
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>

Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.

What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."

Jeff DeWitt

 

billy ray wrote:
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>

Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.

What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."

Jeff DeWitt

 

The writer is from Chicago, if he went to the local schools he is lucky to
be able to read and write at all...


>
> Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
>
> What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the last
> SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two and four
> door models will be offered."
>
> Jeff DeWitt

 

The writer is from Chicago, if he went to the local schools he is lucky to
be able to read and write at all...


>
> Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
>
> What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the last
> SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two and four
> door models will be offered."
>
> Jeff DeWitt

 

The writer is from Chicago, if he went to the local schools he is lucky to
be able to read and write at all...


>
> Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
>
> What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the last
> SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two and four
> door models will be offered."
>
> Jeff DeWitt