new wrangler - ug
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
The United States of American may have won the battles, but we lost
World War II.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
World War II.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
That and the State of Kalifornia makes anything built before 1976
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
That and the State of Kalifornia makes anything built before 1976
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
That and the State of Kalifornia makes anything built before 1976
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
worth thirty thousand.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
billy ray wrote:
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>
Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."
Jeff DeWitt
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>
Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."
Jeff DeWitt
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
billy ray wrote:
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>
Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."
Jeff DeWitt
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>
Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."
Jeff DeWitt
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
billy ray wrote:
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>
Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."
Jeff DeWitt
> This is paragraph two from that new report:
>
> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors.
> The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door
> model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a
> row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the
> standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>
> You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4
> door models are slated for production.
>
>
> <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they
>>> said.
>>>
>>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they
>>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door.
>>>
>> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but
>> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the
>> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty
>> hard to misinterpret:
>>
>> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two
>> doors."
>>
>> It goes on to say
>>
>> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first
>> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline
>> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel
>> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup."
>>
>> Full article is here:
>>
>> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html
>>
>> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance
>> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of
>> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07
>> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an
>> announcement to gauge backlash?
>>
>> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't
>> make sense to me either.
>>
>> - Dan -
>>
>
>
Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the
last SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two
and four door models will be offered."
Jeff DeWitt
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
The writer is from Chicago, if he went to the local schools he is lucky to
be able to read and write at all...
>
> Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
>
> What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the last
> SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two and four
> door models will be offered."
>
> Jeff DeWitt
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
The writer is from Chicago, if he went to the local schools he is lucky to
be able to read and write at all...
>
> Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
>
> What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the last
> SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two and four
> door models will be offered."
>
> Jeff DeWitt
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: new wrangler - ug
The writer is from Chicago, if he went to the local schools he is lucky to
be able to read and write at all...
>
> Oh, I see the confusion now, it's a very clumsily written sentence.
>
> What he SHOULD have said was something like "The 2006 Wrangler is the last
> SUV to be offered only as a two door, starting next year both two and four
> door models will be offered."
>
> Jeff DeWitt