New tire decision
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
KMs
> >that
> >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
A/Ts
> >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
rim
> >> >size is good.
> >>
> >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> >>
> >
> >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
changes
> >as the KO.
> >
>
> Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
Well
> not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
spaced.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
>
>
> The KMs still look different enough.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
>
>
> Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
KMs
> >that
> >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
A/Ts
> >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
rim
> >> >size is good.
> >>
> >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> >>
> >
> >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
changes
> >as the KO.
> >
>
> Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
Well
> not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
spaced.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
>
>
> The KMs still look different enough.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
>
>
> Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
KMs
> >that
> >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
A/Ts
> >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
rim
> >> >size is good.
> >>
> >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> >>
> >
> >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
changes
> >as the KO.
> >
>
> Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
Well
> not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
spaced.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
>
>
> The KMs still look different enough.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
>
>
> Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
KMs
> >that
> >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
A/Ts
> >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
rim
> >> >size is good.
> >>
> >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> >>
> >
> >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
changes
> >as the KO.
> >
>
> Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
Well
> not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
spaced.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
>
>
> The KMs still look different enough.
>
> http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
>
>
> Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
>
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
aired down.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
>
> "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> > >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
> KMs
> > >that
> > >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
> A/Ts
> > >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
> rim
> > >> >size is good.
> > >>
> > >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> > >>
> > >
> > >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
> changes
> > >as the KO.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
> Well
> > not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
> spaced.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
> >
> >
> > The KMs still look different enough.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
> >
> >
> > Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> > nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
aired down.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
>
> "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> > >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
> KMs
> > >that
> > >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
> A/Ts
> > >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
> rim
> > >> >size is good.
> > >>
> > >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> > >>
> > >
> > >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
> changes
> > >as the KO.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
> Well
> > not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
> spaced.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
> >
> >
> > The KMs still look different enough.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
> >
> >
> > Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> > nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
aired down.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
>
> "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> > >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
> KMs
> > >that
> > >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
> A/Ts
> > >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
> rim
> > >> >size is good.
> > >>
> > >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> > >>
> > >
> > >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
> changes
> > >as the KO.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
> Well
> > not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
> spaced.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
> >
> >
> > The KMs still look different enough.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
> >
> >
> > Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> > nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
aired down.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
>
> "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> > >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
> KMs
> > >that
> > >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
> A/Ts
> > >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
> rim
> > >> >size is good.
> > >>
> > >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> > >>
> > >
> > >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
> changes
> > >as the KO.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
> Well
> > not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
> spaced.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
> >
> >
> > The KMs still look different enough.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
> >
> >
> > Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> > nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
aired down.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
>
> "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> > >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
> KMs
> > >that
> > >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
> A/Ts
> > >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
> rim
> > >> >size is good.
> > >>
> > >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> > >>
> > >
> > >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
> changes
> > >as the KO.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
> Well
> > not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
> spaced.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
> >
> >
> > The KMs still look different enough.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
> >
> >
> > Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> > nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
aired down.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
>
> "Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> news:3f859729_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > In article <vob4u8f7jgtm22@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3f84b1b3_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> > >> In article <vo6eiu2dcgut25@corp.supernews.com>,
> > >> Jeff Strickland <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >I run the 32x11.50 BFG Mud Terrain tires, the old style not the new
> KMs
> > >that
> > >> >roughly correlate to the All Terrain KO. You might recall that the
> A/Ts
> > >> >recently became A/T KO, well the M/Ts are now M/T KM. Your choice of
> rim
> > >> >size is good.
> > >>
> > >> So what is the difference between the old BFG MTs and the new KMs?
> > >>
> > >
> > >They changed the lugs on the edges. The KM has roughtly equivelent
> changes
> > >as the KO.
> > >
> >
> > Okay. So you are saying the KMs are more like the A/T KOs on the edges.
> Well
> > not really but I know what you mean. The A/T edges are more closely
> spaced.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41347.html
> >
> >
> > The KMs still look different enough.
> >
> > http://www.tyres1.com/search/products/cond/41538.html
> >
> >
> > Now if there was a pic of the old M/Ts :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> > nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
The difference between the AT and it's AT KO replacement on my
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/tread.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/tread.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
The difference between the AT and it's AT KO replacement on my
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/tread.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/tread.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
The difference between the AT and it's AT KO replacement on my
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/tread.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/tread.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> What I thought I said is the AT was changed to the AT KO. The same changes
> that were done to the AT to make it the AT KO were done to the MT to make it
> the MT KM. Obviously, the changes were not the same because the tires are
> remarkably different, but the changes are in the same vein. I think I would
> need the AT and the AT KO to be side by side to point out the differences,
> and presumably improvements. I would also need theMT and the MT KM to be
> side by side to point out the differences. I think the main difference is
> the tread is more aggressive where it wraps around and becomes the sidewall.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
They are also more quiet.
Mike Romain wrote:
> The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
> beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
> aired down.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Mike Romain wrote:
> The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
> beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
> aired down.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New tire decision
They are also more quiet.
Mike Romain wrote:
> The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
> beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
> aired down.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
Mike Romain wrote:
> The tread is slightly more aggressive out at the edge and the rim has a
> beefier ridge to it to supposedly stop it from packing up with dirt when
> aired down.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________