Proportion the wheels, it just the Libby, plain and simple.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

gregw45 wrote:
>
> I vote for a Libby front end on a Durango.
> <http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid102/p7e74901020947f9f27db91912be66b71/f9b8e0cd.jpg>

 

Proportion the wheels, it just the Libby, plain and simple.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

gregw45 wrote:
>
> I vote for a Libby front end on a Durango.
> <http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid102/p7e74901020947f9f27db91912be66b71/f9b8e0cd.jpg>

 

But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is none.

You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car company of
the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the Unlimited
is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I see no
rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is a bad
idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
successful idea anyhow.




"attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is for.
> All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose and
> essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and the
> liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep into its
> finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
evolution
> and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep is now
a
> foreign "car"
> "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the same
thing
> > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's point,
> though.
> > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just resurrect
> (steal)
> > >good ideas from someone else?
> >
> > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> >
> > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought the
> model
> > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> >
> > Where's the ripoff?
> >
> >
> > Robert Bills
> > KG6LMV
> > Orange County CA
> >
> > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > http://www.RobertBills.com
>
>

 

But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is none.

You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car company of
the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the Unlimited
is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I see no
rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is a bad
idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
successful idea anyhow.




"attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is for.
> All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose and
> essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and the
> liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep into its
> finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
evolution
> and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep is now
a
> foreign "car"
> "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the same
thing
> > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's point,
> though.
> > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just resurrect
> (steal)
> > >good ideas from someone else?
> >
> > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> >
> > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought the
> model
> > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> >
> > Where's the ripoff?
> >
> >
> > Robert Bills
> > KG6LMV
> > Orange County CA
> >
> > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > http://www.RobertBills.com
>
>

 

But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is none.

You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car company of
the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the Unlimited
is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I see no
rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is a bad
idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
successful idea anyhow.




"attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is for.
> All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose and
> essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and the
> liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep into its
> finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
evolution
> and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep is now
a
> foreign "car"
> "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the same
thing
> > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's point,
> though.
> > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just resurrect
> (steal)
> > >good ideas from someone else?
> >
> > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> >
> > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought the
> model
> > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> >
> > Where's the ripoff?
> >
> >
> > Robert Bills
> > KG6LMV
> > Orange County CA
> >
> > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > http://www.RobertBills.com
>
>

 

I can't see the rip off idea either. I for one am glad that they are
bringing back a longer wheel base jeep. They just need to do it in the
rubicon package.

Dan Ferrell
84 CJ
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1022oi2keml4h9f@corp.supernews.com...
> But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is none.
>
> You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car company
of
> the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the
Unlimited
> is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I
see no
> rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is a
bad
> idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
> successful idea anyhow.
>
>
>
>
> "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is
for.
> > All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose and
> > essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and
the
> > liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep into
its
> > finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
> evolution
> > and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep is
now
> a
> > foreign "car"
> > "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the same
> thing
> > > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's
point,
> > though.
> > > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just
resurrect
> > (steal)
> > > >good ideas from someone else?
> > >
> > > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> > >
> > > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought
the
> > model
> > > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> > >
> > > Where's the ripoff?
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Bills
> > > KG6LMV
> > > Orange County CA
> > >
> > > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > > http://www.RobertBills.com
> >
> >
>

 

I can't see the rip off idea either. I for one am glad that they are
bringing back a longer wheel base jeep. They just need to do it in the
rubicon package.

Dan Ferrell
84 CJ
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1022oi2keml4h9f@corp.supernews.com...
> But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is none.
>
> You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car company
of
> the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the
Unlimited
> is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I
see no
> rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is a
bad
> idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
> successful idea anyhow.
>
>
>
>
> "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is
for.
> > All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose and
> > essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and
the
> > liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep into
its
> > finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
> evolution
> > and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep is
now
> a
> > foreign "car"
> > "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the same
> thing
> > > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's
point,
> > though.
> > > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just
resurrect
> > (steal)
> > > >good ideas from someone else?
> > >
> > > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> > >
> > > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought
the
> > model
> > > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> > >
> > > Where's the ripoff?
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Bills
> > > KG6LMV
> > > Orange County CA
> > >
> > > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > > http://www.RobertBills.com
> >
> >
>

 

I can't see the rip off idea either. I for one am glad that they are
bringing back a longer wheel base jeep. They just need to do it in the
rubicon package.

Dan Ferrell
84 CJ
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1022oi2keml4h9f@corp.supernews.com...
> But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is none.
>
> You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car company
of
> the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the
Unlimited
> is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I
see no
> rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is a
bad
> idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
> successful idea anyhow.
>
>
>
>
> "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is
for.
> > All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose and
> > essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and
the
> > liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep into
its
> > finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
> evolution
> > and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep is
now
> a
> > foreign "car"
> > "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the same
> thing
> > > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's
point,
> > though.
> > > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just
resurrect
> > (steal)
> > > >good ideas from someone else?
> > >
> > > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> > >
> > > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought
the
> > model
> > > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> > >
> > > Where's the ripoff?
> > >
> > >
> > > Robert Bills
> > > KG6LMV
> > > Orange County CA
> > >
> > > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > > http://www.RobertBills.com
> >
> >
>

 

Yes, wouldn't that be cool? An Unlimited Rubicon. I can't see any reason why
the Rubi options could not be installed on the Unlimited.



"Dan Ferrell" <dkf92@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:GleUb.2326$8a5.558@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> I can't see the rip off idea either. I for one am glad that they are
> bringing back a longer wheel base jeep. They just need to do it in the
> rubicon package.
>
> Dan Ferrell
> 84 CJ
> "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1022oi2keml4h9f@corp.supernews.com...
> > But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is
none.
> >
> > You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car
company
> of
> > the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the
> Unlimited
> > is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I
> see no
> > rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is
a
> bad
> > idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
> > successful idea anyhow.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is
> for.
> > > All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose
and
> > > essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and
> the
> > > liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep
into
> its
> > > finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
> > evolution
> > > and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep
is
> now
> > a
> > > foreign "car"
> > > "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > > > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > > > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the
same
> > thing
> > > > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's
> point,
> > > though.
> > > > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just
> resurrect
> > > (steal)
> > > > >good ideas from someone else?
> > > >
> > > > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought
> the
> > > model
> > > > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> > > >
> > > > Where's the ripoff?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Robert Bills
> > > > KG6LMV
> > > > Orange County CA
> > > >
> > > > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > > > http://www.RobertBills.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

 

Yes, wouldn't that be cool? An Unlimited Rubicon. I can't see any reason why
the Rubi options could not be installed on the Unlimited.



"Dan Ferrell" <dkf92@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:GleUb.2326$8a5.558@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> I can't see the rip off idea either. I for one am glad that they are
> bringing back a longer wheel base jeep. They just need to do it in the
> rubicon package.
>
> Dan Ferrell
> 84 CJ
> "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1022oi2keml4h9f@corp.supernews.com...
> > But, what is the rip off relative to the Unlimited? Hint: there is
none.
> >
> > You (and apparently only you) seem to think that AMC is the car
company
> of
> > the century when clearly they are not. The fact remains that the
> Unlimited
> > is a revival of the Scrambler idea, which grew out of the CJ6 idea. I
> see no
> > rip off relative to the Unlimited, but I do agree that the Liberty is
a
> bad
> > idea from the perspective of offroading, but it seems to be a pretty
> > successful idea anyhow.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:hhSTb.51238$6O4.1526299@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > the rip-off is of the concept of what a jeep is, and what a jeep is
> for.
> > > All the manufacturers you mentioned kept jeep true to its purpose
and
> > > essence. Krysler has never understood jeepdom and jeep owners, and
> the
> > > liberty is exhibit A and B and C and on and on. AMC evolved jeep
into
> its
> > > finest incarnation. and on many levels. krysler has stopped that
> > evolution
> > > and has screwed up the lineage apparently forever. too bad. jeep
is
> now
> > a
> > > foreign "car"
> > > "Robert Bills" <rdbillsjr@aol.comxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:20040203100838.24654.00001313@mb-m16.aol.com...
> > > > >Ripoff or what? You decide.
> > > > >Why all the fuss over the new Wrangler Unlimited? AMC did the
same
> > thing
> > > > >over 25 years ago and called it the CJ6. I can see Chrysler's
> point,
> > > though.
> > > > >Why spend money on engineering innovation when we can just
> resurrect
> > > (steal)
> > > > >good ideas from someone else?
> > > >
> > > > 1. ****** introduced the CJ-6, not AMC. AMC built the CJ-8.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Chrysler bought out AMC, which bought out Kaiser, which bought
> the
> > > model
> > > > designations, designs, the name "Jeep", etc. from from ******.
> > > >
> > > > Where's the ripoff?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Robert Bills
> > > > KG6LMV
> > > > Orange County CA
> > > >
> > > > http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
> > > > http://www.RobertBills.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>