New Jeep Grand Chicory
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff wrote:
> > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
> The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
> Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> than discarded.
Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
"silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
inline 6 it replaces".
> > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
> The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
> Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> than discarded.
Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
"silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
inline 6 it replaces".
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff wrote:
> > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
> The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
> Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> than discarded.
Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
"silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
inline 6 it replaces".
> > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
> The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
> Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> than discarded.
Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
"silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
inline 6 it replaces".
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff wrote:
> > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
> The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
> Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> than discarded.
Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
"silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
inline 6 it replaces".
> > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
> The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
> Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> than discarded.
Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
"silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
inline 6 it replaces".
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0410121453500.9994@alumni.engin .umich.edu...
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff wrote:
>
> > > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge
Durango.
> > > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost
went
> > > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
>
> > The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
>
> And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
>
> > Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> > grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> > than discarded.
>
> Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
> "silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
> inline 6 it replaces".
BMW manage to make great I6s, no reason why DC shouldnt.
Dave Milne Scotland
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0410121453500.9994@alumni.engin .umich.edu...
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff wrote:
>
> > > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge
Durango.
> > > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost
went
> > > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
>
> > The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
>
> And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
>
> > Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> > grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> > than discarded.
>
> Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
> "silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
> inline 6 it replaces".
BMW manage to make great I6s, no reason why DC shouldnt.
Dave Milne Scotland
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
"Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.58.0410121453500.9994@alumni.engin .umich.edu...
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff wrote:
>
> > > Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge
Durango.
> > > Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost
went
> > > on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> > > taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
>
> > The wrap-around taillights suck, I agree.
>
> And they're all red. No amber turn blinker. Suddenly it's 1991...
>
> > Boo! on the V6 replacing the I6; SUV engines ought to have low-end
> > grunt. That I6 was an institution, and it deserved to be updated rather
> > than discarded.
>
> Agreed. I'm sure Car and Driver will cream their jeans about the
> "silky-smooth V6" being better than the "agricultural-sounding pushrod
> inline 6 it replaces".
BMW manage to make great I6s, no reason why DC shouldnt.
Dave Milne Scotland
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> Yeah, it's got a Hemi in it. Fine and dandy. Problem is, it's UGGGGGLEE!
> Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
>
I have never cared for those clear lights. Looks awefull.
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> Yeah, it's got a Hemi in it. Fine and dandy. Problem is, it's UGGGGGLEE!
> Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
>
I have never cared for those clear lights. Looks awefull.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> Yeah, it's got a Hemi in it. Fine and dandy. Problem is, it's UGGGGGLEE!
> Looks like one of the rejected designs for the new/current Dodge Durango.
> Taillights are the stupid kind and look like the design that almost went
> on the Chevrolet Equinox until someone at Chevrolet said "Clear
> taillights! No! Dude! We TOTALLY have to do clear taillights!"
>
I have never cared for those clear lights. Looks awefull.
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New Jeep Grand Chicory
According Doug W. here, whom took the pictures.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
IsellJeeps wrote:
>
> lol was that really at a car show Bill?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
IsellJeeps wrote:
>
> lol was that really at a car show Bill?