? on new gears for 81 CJ7
02-21-2004, 05:46 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ? on new gears for 81 CJ7
Good guess. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still have
> 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace th
> epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still have
> 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace th
> epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
02-21-2004, 05:46 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ? on new gears for 81 CJ7
Good guess. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still have
> 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace th
> epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still have
> 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace th
> epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
02-21-2004, 05:46 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ? on new gears for 81 CJ7
Good guess. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still have
> 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace th
> epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
CRWLR wrote:
>
> You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still have
> 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace th
> epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
02-21-2004, 07:48 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ? on new gears for 81 CJ7
It seems to me that the pitch of the teeth will be different, at the very
least. It also occurs to me that the amount that the carrier re-centers the
ring gear is not the same amount that the ring gear is thick ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4037DFBA.58B2A32D@***.net...
> Good guess. ;-)
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still
have
> > 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace
th
> > epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
least. It also occurs to me that the amount that the carrier re-centers the
ring gear is not the same amount that the ring gear is thick ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4037DFBA.58B2A32D@***.net...
> Good guess. ;-)
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still
have
> > 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace
th
> > epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
02-21-2004, 07:48 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ? on new gears for 81 CJ7
It seems to me that the pitch of the teeth will be different, at the very
least. It also occurs to me that the amount that the carrier re-centers the
ring gear is not the same amount that the ring gear is thick ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4037DFBA.58B2A32D@***.net...
> Good guess. ;-)
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still
have
> > 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace
th
> > epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
least. It also occurs to me that the amount that the carrier re-centers the
ring gear is not the same amount that the ring gear is thick ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4037DFBA.58B2A32D@***.net...
> Good guess. ;-)
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still
have
> > 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace
th
> > epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
02-21-2004, 07:48 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ? on new gears for 81 CJ7
It seems to me that the pitch of the teeth will be different, at the very
least. It also occurs to me that the amount that the carrier re-centers the
ring gear is not the same amount that the ring gear is thick ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4037DFBA.58B2A32D@***.net...
> Good guess. ;-)
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still
have
> > 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace
th
> > epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
least. It also occurs to me that the amount that the carrier re-centers the
ring gear is not the same amount that the ring gear is thick ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4037DFBA.58B2A32D@***.net...
> Good guess. ;-)
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> CRWLR wrote:
> >
> > You need the new carrier. Given the fact that the ring gear may still
have
> > 41 teeth on it, I don't know if you can keep this part and only replace
th
> > epinion, but my guess is that you can not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)