I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
recently (recall on the gas tank).

Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
it had about a $40k sticker on it.

 

A cool $57000 here in Canada..


"Brian Foster" <brianfoster@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:yK8rd.61249$g21.4700@fe1.texas.rr.com...
>I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>recently (recall on the gas tank).
>
> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
> it had about a $40k sticker on it.
>

 

A cool $57000 here in Canada..


"Brian Foster" <brianfoster@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:yK8rd.61249$g21.4700@fe1.texas.rr.com...
>I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>recently (recall on the gas tank).
>
> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
> it had about a $40k sticker on it.
>

 

A cool $57000 here in Canada..


"Brian Foster" <brianfoster@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:yK8rd.61249$g21.4700@fe1.texas.rr.com...
>I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>recently (recall on the gas tank).
>
> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
> it had about a $40k sticker on it.
>

 

Mike Hall did pass the time by typing:
> A cool $57000 here in Canada..

They ride nice and sure have plenty of power
but I'm not so sure about the inside. The rear
seats fold, but they seat bottoms don't lift, they
just stay there like a bench seat.

Not so sure it's worth the price tag.

Might change my mind in a year, but for now I'm keeping
the 93.


> "Brian Foster" wrote...
>> I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>> recently (recall on the gas tank).
>>
>> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
>> it had about a $40k sticker on it.

 

Mike Hall did pass the time by typing:
> A cool $57000 here in Canada..

They ride nice and sure have plenty of power
but I'm not so sure about the inside. The rear
seats fold, but they seat bottoms don't lift, they
just stay there like a bench seat.

Not so sure it's worth the price tag.

Might change my mind in a year, but for now I'm keeping
the 93.


> "Brian Foster" wrote...
>> I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>> recently (recall on the gas tank).
>>
>> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
>> it had about a $40k sticker on it.

 

Mike Hall did pass the time by typing:
> A cool $57000 here in Canada..

They ride nice and sure have plenty of power
but I'm not so sure about the inside. The rear
seats fold, but they seat bottoms don't lift, they
just stay there like a bench seat.

Not so sure it's worth the price tag.

Might change my mind in a year, but for now I'm keeping
the 93.


> "Brian Foster" wrote...
>> I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>> recently (recall on the gas tank).
>>
>> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out and
>> it had about a $40k sticker on it.

 

I didn't like the interior at all.. some of the fittings looked and felt
cheap.. liked the Hemi and QuadraDrive II.. preferred the old style sliding
roof rails.. prefer the 93-98 model anyway.. my '94 GC stays in the driveway
for now..


"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Jhard.102799$tU4.27437@okepread06...
> Mike Hall did pass the time by typing:
>> A cool $57000 here in Canada..
>
> They ride nice and sure have plenty of power
> but I'm not so sure about the inside. The rear
> seats fold, but they seat bottoms don't lift, they
> just stay there like a bench seat.
>
> Not so sure it's worth the price tag.
>
> Might change my mind in a year, but for now I'm keeping
> the 93.
>
>
>> "Brian Foster" wrote...
>>> I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>>> recently (recall on the gas tank).
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out
>>> and
>>> it had about a $40k sticker on it.
>
>
>

 

I didn't like the interior at all.. some of the fittings looked and felt
cheap.. liked the Hemi and QuadraDrive II.. preferred the old style sliding
roof rails.. prefer the 93-98 model anyway.. my '94 GC stays in the driveway
for now..


"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Jhard.102799$tU4.27437@okepread06...
> Mike Hall did pass the time by typing:
>> A cool $57000 here in Canada..
>
> They ride nice and sure have plenty of power
> but I'm not so sure about the inside. The rear
> seats fold, but they seat bottoms don't lift, they
> just stay there like a bench seat.
>
> Not so sure it's worth the price tag.
>
> Might change my mind in a year, but for now I'm keeping
> the 93.
>
>
>> "Brian Foster" wrote...
>>> I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>>> recently (recall on the gas tank).
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out
>>> and
>>> it had about a $40k sticker on it.
>
>
>

 

I didn't like the interior at all.. some of the fittings looked and felt
cheap.. liked the Hemi and QuadraDrive II.. preferred the old style sliding
roof rails.. prefer the 93-98 model anyway.. my '94 GC stays in the driveway
for now..


"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Jhard.102799$tU4.27437@okepread06...
> Mike Hall did pass the time by typing:
>> A cool $57000 here in Canada..
>
> They ride nice and sure have plenty of power
> but I'm not so sure about the inside. The rear
> seats fold, but they seat bottoms don't lift, they
> just stay there like a bench seat.
>
> Not so sure it's worth the price tag.
>
> Might change my mind in a year, but for now I'm keeping
> the 93.
>
>
>> "Brian Foster" wrote...
>>> I saw the new GC with the 5.7? L Hemi when my 02 GC was in for service
>>> recently (recall on the gas tank).
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried these out yet? The one in the showroom was decked out
>>> and
>>> it had about a $40k sticker on it.
>
>
>