Motor question
07-19-2003, 02:36 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Motor question
I have a Ford 360 at my disposal, free, what kind of hassle would I have
adapting this to a t-150? I have not pulled the 360 yet from this old F-100,
but once I get rid of the hull, I have to find something to do with this
engine . Thought it might be fun to cram it into the CJ.
Any thoughts?
JLT1
adapting this to a t-150? I have not pulled the 360 yet from this old F-100,
but once I get rid of the hull, I have to find something to do with this
engine . Thought it might be fun to cram it into the CJ.
Any thoughts?
JLT1
07-19-2003, 04:39 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
http://advanceadapters.com
You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A Ford
transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford
engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on the
Advance Adapters site.
Earle
"JLT1" <rumored2exist@***.net> wrote in message
news:bdgSa.4264$ff.1540@fed1read01...
> I have a Ford 360 at my disposal, free, what kind of hassle would I have
> adapting this to a t-150? I have not pulled the 360 yet from this old
F-100,
> but once I get rid of the hull, I have to find something to do with this
> engine . Thought it might be fun to cram it into the CJ.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> JLT1
>
>
You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A Ford
transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford
engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on the
Advance Adapters site.
Earle
"JLT1" <rumored2exist@***.net> wrote in message
news:bdgSa.4264$ff.1540@fed1read01...
> I have a Ford 360 at my disposal, free, what kind of hassle would I have
> adapting this to a t-150? I have not pulled the 360 yet from this old
F-100,
> but once I get rid of the hull, I have to find something to do with this
> engine . Thought it might be fun to cram it into the CJ.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> JLT1
>
>
07-19-2003, 05:18 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. ;o)
I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up
getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and
we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter for
the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I
learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not necessarily
a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no
matter what you pay for it.
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > http://advanceadapters.com
> >
> > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A
Ford
> > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford
> > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on
the
> > Advance Adapters site.
> >
> > Earle
I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up
getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and
we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter for
the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I
learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not necessarily
a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no
matter what you pay for it.
Earle
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > http://advanceadapters.com
> >
> > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A
Ford
> > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford
> > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on
the
> > Advance Adapters site.
> >
> > Earle
07-19-2003, 08:58 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
The 352, 360, 390, 427 and 428 all used the same block. Don't recall a
FoMoCo 426...maybe Mopar?
07-19-2003, 10:45 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient cooling,
adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was
good enough for my dad in WWII...
Earle
"Eric" <gymrat@***.net> wrote in message
news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.***.net.. .
> Earle,
>
> I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
> course...
>
> Eric
> 99 TJ SE
>
> "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
> news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine.
;o)
> >
> > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up
> > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal,
and
> > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter
> for
> > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that
I
> > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
> necessarily
> > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain
no
> > matter what you pay for it.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Earle Horton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://advanceadapters.com
> > > >
> > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too.
> A
> > Ford
> > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
> Ford
> > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information
on
> > the
> > > > Advance Adapters site.
> > > >
> > > > Earle
> >
> >
>
>
adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was
good enough for my dad in WWII...
Earle
"Eric" <gymrat@***.net> wrote in message
news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.***.net.. .
> Earle,
>
> I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
> course...
>
> Eric
> 99 TJ SE
>
> "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
> news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine.
;o)
> >
> > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up
> > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal,
and
> > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter
> for
> > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that
I
> > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
> necessarily
> > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain
no
> > matter what you pay for it.
> >
> > Earle
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > > Earle Horton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://advanceadapters.com
> > > >
> > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too.
> A
> > Ford
> > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
> Ford
> > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information
on
> > the
> > > > Advance Adapters site.
> > > >
> > > > Earle
> >
> >
>
>
07-19-2003, 10:46 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
Earle,
I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
course...
Eric
99 TJ SE
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. ;o)
>
> I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up
> getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and
> we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter
for
> the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I
> learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
necessarily
> a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no
> matter what you pay for it.
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Earle Horton wrote:
> > >
> > > http://advanceadapters.com
> > >
> > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too.
A
> Ford
> > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
Ford
> > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on
> the
> > > Advance Adapters site.
> > >
> > > Earle
>
>
I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
course...
Eric
99 TJ SE
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. ;o)
>
> I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up
> getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and
> we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter
for
> the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I
> learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
necessarily
> a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no
> matter what you pay for it.
>
> Earle
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing
> > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Earle Horton wrote:
> > >
> > > http://advanceadapters.com
> > >
> > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too.
A
> Ford
> > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
Ford
> > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on
> the
> > > Advance Adapters site.
> > >
> > > Earle
>
>
07-20-2003, 01:41 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
Yup, on each side.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
TJim wrote:
>
> Alright, Earle!!! "Real Jeeps have 4 cylinders"!!!
> ...Bill...
> ;)
> TJim
> 98 TJ SE 2.5L
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
TJim wrote:
>
> Alright, Earle!!! "Real Jeeps have 4 cylinders"!!!
> ...Bill...
> ;)
> TJim
> 98 TJ SE 2.5L
07-20-2003, 03:19 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
Do you use yours as a daily driver?
Eric
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bfd06n$d1rig$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient
cooling,
> adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was
> good enough for my dad in WWII...
>
> Earle
>
> "Eric" <gymrat@***.net> wrote in message
> news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.***.net.. .
> > Earle,
> >
> > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
> > course...
> >
> > Eric
> > 99 TJ SE
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in
message
> > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine.
> ;o)
> > >
> > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound
up
> > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal,
> and
> > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case
adapter
> > for
> > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing
that
> I
> > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
> > necessarily
> > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain
> no
> > > matter what you pay for it.
> > >
> > > Earle
> > >
> > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too,
seeing
> > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Earle Horton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://advanceadapters.com
> > > > >
> > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford
too.
> > A
> > > Ford
> > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
> > Ford
> > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information
> on
> > > the
> > > > > Advance Adapters site.
> > > > >
> > > > > Earle
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Eric
"Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
news:bfd06n$d1rig$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient
cooling,
> adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was
> good enough for my dad in WWII...
>
> Earle
>
> "Eric" <gymrat@***.net> wrote in message
> news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.***.net.. .
> > Earle,
> >
> > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
> > course...
> >
> > Eric
> > 99 TJ SE
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in
message
> > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine.
> ;o)
> > >
> > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound
up
> > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal,
> and
> > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case
adapter
> > for
> > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing
that
> I
> > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
> > necessarily
> > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain
> no
> > > matter what you pay for it.
> > >
> > > Earle
> > >
> > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
> > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too,
seeing
> > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Earle Horton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://advanceadapters.com
> > > > >
> > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford
too.
> > A
> > > Ford
> > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
> > Ford
> > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information
> on
> > > the
> > > > > Advance Adapters site.
> > > > >
> > > > > Earle
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
07-20-2003, 03:21 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
Nawww, he only drives it nightly, when the speed limit is lower
and it can keep up.
Eric wrote:
> Do you use yours as a daily driver?
>
> Eric
> "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
> news:bfd06n$d1rig$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient
> cooling,
>> adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was
>> good enough for my dad in WWII...
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Eric" <gymrat@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.***.net.. .
>> > Earle,
>> >
>> > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
>> > course...
>> >
>> > Eric
>> > 99 TJ SE
>> >
>> > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in
> message
>> > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine.
>> ;o)
>> > >
>> > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound
> up
>> > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal,
>> and
>> > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case
> adapter
>> > for
>> > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing
> that
>> I
>> > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
>> > necessarily
>> > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain
>> no
>> > > matter what you pay for it.
>> > >
>> > > Earle
>> > >
>> > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
>> > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too,
> seeing
>> > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
>> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > > >
>> > > > Earle Horton wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > http://advanceadapters.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford
> too.
>> > A
>> > > Ford
>> > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
>> > Ford
>> > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information
>> on
>> > > the
>> > > > > Advance Adapters site.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Earle
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
and it can keep up.
Eric wrote:
> Do you use yours as a daily driver?
>
> Eric
> "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message
> news:bfd06n$d1rig$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient
> cooling,
>> adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was
>> good enough for my dad in WWII...
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Eric" <gymrat@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.***.net.. .
>> > Earle,
>> >
>> > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of
>> > course...
>> >
>> > Eric
>> > 99 TJ SE
>> >
>> > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in
> message
>> > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine.
>> ;o)
>> > >
>> > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound
> up
>> > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal,
>> and
>> > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case
> adapter
>> > for
>> > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing
> that
>> I
>> > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not
>> > necessarily
>> > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain
>> no
>> > > matter what you pay for it.
>> > >
>> > > Earle
>> > >
>> > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@***.net...
>> > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too,
> seeing
>> > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is.
>> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> > > >
>> > > > Earle Horton wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > http://advanceadapters.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford
> too.
>> > A
>> > > Ford
>> > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a
>> > Ford
>> > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information
>> on
>> > > the
>> > > > > Advance Adapters site.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Earle
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
07-21-2003, 08:18 AM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Motor question
Hee hee hee...
Got one of those, too...
:)
TJim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F1AD3DF.75EFDFC0@***.net...
> Yup, on each side.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> TJim wrote:
> >
> > Alright, Earle!!! "Real Jeeps have 4 cylinders"!!!
> > ...Bill...
> > ;)
> > TJim
> > 98 TJ SE 2.5L
Got one of those, too...
:)
TJim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F1AD3DF.75EFDFC0@***.net...
> Yup, on each side.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> TJim wrote:
> >
> > Alright, Earle!!! "Real Jeeps have 4 cylinders"!!!
> > ...Bill...
> > ;)
> > TJim
> > 98 TJ SE 2.5L
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)