Motor question
I have a Ford 360 at my disposal, free, what kind of hassle would I have
adapting this to a t-150? I have not pulled the 360 yet from this old F-100, but once I get rid of the hull, I have to find something to do with this engine . Thought it might be fun to cram it into the CJ. Any thoughts? JLT1 |
Re: Motor question
http://advanceadapters.com
You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A Ford transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on the Advance Adapters site. Earle "JLT1" <rumored2exist@cox.net> wrote in message news:bdgSa.4264$ff.1540@fed1read01... > I have a Ford 360 at my disposal, free, what kind of hassle would I have > adapting this to a t-150? I have not pulled the 360 yet from this old F-100, > but once I get rid of the hull, I have to find something to do with this > engine . Thought it might be fun to cram it into the CJ. > > Any thoughts? > > JLT1 > > |
Re: Motor question
This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. ;o)
I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter for the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not necessarily a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no matter what you pay for it. Earle "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@cox.net... > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is. > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Earle Horton wrote: > > > > http://advanceadapters.com > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A Ford > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on the > > Advance Adapters site. > > > > Earle |
Re: Motor question
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@cox.net... > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is. > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ The 352, 360, 390, 427 and 428 all used the same block. Don't recall a FoMoCo 426...maybe Mopar? |
Re: Motor question
Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient cooling,
adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was good enough for my dad in WWII... Earle "Eric" <gymrat@cox.net> wrote in message news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.cox.net.. . > Earle, > > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of > course... > > Eric > 99 TJ SE > > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de... > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. ;o) > > > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter > for > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not > necessarily > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no > > matter what you pay for it. > > > > Earle > > > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@cox.net... > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is. > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > > > Earle Horton wrote: > > > > > > > > http://advanceadapters.com > > > > > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. > A > > Ford > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a > Ford > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on > > the > > > > Advance Adapters site. > > > > > > > > Earle > > > > > > |
Re: Motor question
Earle,
I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of course... Eric 99 TJ SE "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de... > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. ;o) > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, and > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter for > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that I > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not necessarily > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain no > matter what you pay for it. > > Earle > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@cox.net... > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is. > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > Earle Horton wrote: > > > > > > http://advanceadapters.com > > > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. A > Ford > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a Ford > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information on > the > > > Advance Adapters site. > > > > > > Earle > > |
Re: Motor question
Yup, on each side.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ TJim wrote: > > Alright, Earle!!! "Real Jeeps have 4 cylinders"!!! > ...Bill... > ;) > TJim > 98 TJ SE 2.5L |
Re: Motor question
Do you use yours as a daily driver?
Eric "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message news:bfd06n$d1rig$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de... > Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient cooling, > adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was > good enough for my dad in WWII... > > Earle > > "Eric" <gymrat@cox.net> wrote in message > news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.cox.net.. . > > Earle, > > > > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of > > course... > > > > Eric > > 99 TJ SE > > > > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message > > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. > ;o) > > > > > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound up > > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, > and > > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case adapter > > for > > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing that > I > > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not > > necessarily > > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain > no > > > matter what you pay for it. > > > > > > Earle > > > > > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@cox.net... > > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, seeing > > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is. > > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > > > > > Earle Horton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://advanceadapters.com > > > > > > > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford too. > > A > > > Ford > > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a > > Ford > > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information > on > > > the > > > > > Advance Adapters site. > > > > > > > > > > Earle > > > > > > > > > > > > |
Re: Motor question
Nawww, he only drives it nightly, when the speed limit is lower
and it can keep up. Eric wrote: > Do you use yours as a daily driver? > > Eric > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in message > news:bfd06n$d1rig$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de... >> Not me. I like to bash the 4.0 myself. Over powered, insufficient > cooling, >> adds excess weight, who needs it in a Wrangler? Flat head four banger was >> good enough for my dad in WWII... >> >> Earle >> >> "Eric" <gymrat@cox.net> wrote in message >> news:7onSa.68070$o86.48760@news1.central.cox.net.. . >> > Earle, >> > >> > I thought you were always bashing the 'ol 2.5L. I may be mistaken, of >> > course... >> > >> > Eric >> > 99 TJ SE >> > >> > "Earle Horton" <enfermero_diabolico@registerednurses.com> wrote in > message >> > news:bfcd0o$d952f$1@ID-147790.news.uni-berlin.de... >> > > This is one reason I decided to stick with the four cylinder engine. >> ;o) >> > > >> > > I have been involved with a couple engine swaps. The first one wound > up >> > > getting redone because the Ford originally used was less than optimal, >> and >> > > we replaced it with a Chevy. The transmission to transfer case > adapter >> > for >> > > the Ford was composed of angle iron welded together (!). One thing > that >> I >> > > learned from this experience is that a free donor engine is not >> > necessarily >> > > a bargain, but the engine that does exactly what you want is a bargain >> no >> > > matter what you pay for it. >> > > >> > > Earle >> > > >> > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message >> > > news:3F19B2DA.214131EE@cox.net... >> > > > He might consider using the Ford's Dana 44 front axle too, > seeing >> > > > the 360" is the same 750 pound big block the 426", 428" is. >> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O >> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> > > > >> > > > Earle Horton wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > http://advanceadapters.com >> > > > > >> > > > > You might also think about using the transmission from the Ford > too. >> > A >> > > Ford >> > > > > transmission to Jeep transfer case adapter might be cheaper than a >> > Ford >> > > > > engine to Jeep transmission adapter. There is lots of information >> on >> > > the >> > > > > Advance Adapters site. >> > > > > >> > > > > Earle >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > |
Re: Motor question
Hee hee hee...
Got one of those, too... :) TJim 98 TJ SE 90 SJ GW "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:3F1AD3DF.75EFDFC0@cox.net... > Yup, on each side. > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > TJim wrote: > > > > Alright, Earle!!! "Real Jeeps have 4 cylinders"!!! > > ...Bill... > > ;) > > TJim > > 98 TJ SE 2.5L |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands