"F. Robert Falbo" <rfalbo1@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.06.03.21.33.04.718540@twcny.rr.com.. .
> So in addition to having a grudge against Diesels, you also don't listen
very well. <

Did someone say something?

> It stated that the clean diesels of europe still don't meet the stricter
emission regulations of the US. ...And it goes on to
interview Gerhard Schmidt of Ford, who states "We are working hard to make
it happen" when asked if Ford is going to start making Diesel cars. <

Gerhard will be working at the circus, follwing the elephants, after these
things again fail in the marketplace.

< The diesel particulate converter is aimed at allowing diesels to meet US
emission standards of the future. >

It'd be better used as a klie-detector at a Michael Moore film festival.

> You really need to face the fact that even though the diesel was invented
before the gasoline engine...., <

Whereupon even 19th century people dying of every conceiveable bacterial
infection an morbid disease realized another pox on their lives wasn't
needed!

> ....its closer to the perfect engine than the gas engine <

Which, apprently, is why it's been such a great success in the eyes of the
public!

> (the Sterling is even closer, but nobody's been able to effectively
harness it for average driving.)<

Alright, this is too weird for me: Bio-diesel, that's for you, run yer car
on doggie poo!

 

You know these are not just my opinions, the diesel will never burn
clean enough to pass California's pollution laws. You've seen the
numbers that are twice that of gasoline's specs that they can't meet:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html How about finding a
site that thinks they can, with some numbers, like it's time to put up
or shut up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"F. Robert Falbo" wrote:
>
> So in addition to having a grudge against Diesels, you also don't listen
> very well. It stated that the clean diesels of europe still don't meet
> the stricter emission regulations of the US. ...And it goes on to
> interview Gerhard Schmidt of Ford, who states "We are working hard to make
> it happen" when asked if Ford is going to start making Diesel cars. The
> diesel particulate converter is aimed at allowing diesels to meet US
> emission standards of the future.
>
> You really need to face the fact that even though the diesel was invented
> before the gasoline engine, its closer to the perfect engine than the gas
> engine (the Sterling is even closer, but nobody's been able to effectively
> harness it for average driving.)
>
> -bob-

 

You know these are not just my opinions, the diesel will never burn
clean enough to pass California's pollution laws. You've seen the
numbers that are twice that of gasoline's specs that they can't meet:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html How about finding a
site that thinks they can, with some numbers, like it's time to put up
or shut up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"F. Robert Falbo" wrote:
>
> So in addition to having a grudge against Diesels, you also don't listen
> very well. It stated that the clean diesels of europe still don't meet
> the stricter emission regulations of the US. ...And it goes on to
> interview Gerhard Schmidt of Ford, who states "We are working hard to make
> it happen" when asked if Ford is going to start making Diesel cars. The
> diesel particulate converter is aimed at allowing diesels to meet US
> emission standards of the future.
>
> You really need to face the fact that even though the diesel was invented
> before the gasoline engine, its closer to the perfect engine than the gas
> engine (the Sterling is even closer, but nobody's been able to effectively
> harness it for average driving.)
>
> -bob-

 

You know these are not just my opinions, the diesel will never burn
clean enough to pass California's pollution laws. You've seen the
numbers that are twice that of gasoline's specs that they can't meet:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html How about finding a
site that thinks they can, with some numbers, like it's time to put up
or shut up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"F. Robert Falbo" wrote:
>
> So in addition to having a grudge against Diesels, you also don't listen
> very well. It stated that the clean diesels of europe still don't meet
> the stricter emission regulations of the US. ...And it goes on to
> interview Gerhard Schmidt of Ford, who states "We are working hard to make
> it happen" when asked if Ford is going to start making Diesel cars. The
> diesel particulate converter is aimed at allowing diesels to meet US
> emission standards of the future.
>
> You really need to face the fact that even though the diesel was invented
> before the gasoline engine, its closer to the perfect engine than the gas
> engine (the Sterling is even closer, but nobody's been able to effectively
> harness it for average driving.)
>
> -bob-

 

You know these are not just my opinions, the diesel will never burn
clean enough to pass California's pollution laws. You've seen the
numbers that are twice that of gasoline's specs that they can't meet:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html How about finding a
site that thinks they can, with some numbers, like it's time to put up
or shut up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"F. Robert Falbo" wrote:
>
> So in addition to having a grudge against Diesels, you also don't listen
> very well. It stated that the clean diesels of europe still don't meet
> the stricter emission regulations of the US. ...And it goes on to
> interview Gerhard Schmidt of Ford, who states "We are working hard to make
> it happen" when asked if Ford is going to start making Diesel cars. The
> diesel particulate converter is aimed at allowing diesels to meet US
> emission standards of the future.
>
> You really need to face the fact that even though the diesel was invented
> before the gasoline engine, its closer to the perfect engine than the gas
> engine (the Sterling is even closer, but nobody's been able to effectively
> harness it for average driving.)
>
> -bob-

 

Hi Jerry,
What pisses me off is the diesels are twice as dirty as one of my
hot rod engines that I may not legally drive on the street in a newer
than 1972 chassis.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> There's a far better way...don't build them!

 

Hi Jerry,
What pisses me off is the diesels are twice as dirty as one of my
hot rod engines that I may not legally drive on the street in a newer
than 1972 chassis.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> There's a far better way...don't build them!

 

Hi Jerry,
What pisses me off is the diesels are twice as dirty as one of my
hot rod engines that I may not legally drive on the street in a newer
than 1972 chassis.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> There's a far better way...don't build them!

 

Hi Jerry,
What pisses me off is the diesels are twice as dirty as one of my
hot rod engines that I may not legally drive on the street in a newer
than 1972 chassis.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> There's a far better way...don't build them!

 

Actually we won't hear them bragging because the hybrids are just
getting the regular econo box, 35 MPG. Which, my Thunderbird gets if I
get stuck in Los Angeles traffic.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry McG wrote:
>
> This latest generation of Hollywood traitors will no doubt soon be waxing
> about their new hybrids, and of course the leftist green lemmings will
> follow right along gladly paying Toyota and Honda dealers thousands over
> sticker for the priviledge of driving one of these death traps. Oh, and wait
> until they have to replace the electrics or battery packs in these things.
> Rube Goldberg would be proud.