Jeep VS others
#171
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
An '97 LS1 Corvette:
http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> seconds 87.360 mph.
> Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> seconds 87.360 mph.
> Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#172
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
An '97 LS1 Corvette:
http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> seconds 87.360 mph.
> Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> seconds 87.360 mph.
> Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#173
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
a modified one.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E496.70035A5F@***.net...
> An '97 LS1 Corvette:
> http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> > seconds 87.360 mph.
> > Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E496.70035A5F@***.net...
> An '97 LS1 Corvette:
> http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> > seconds 87.360 mph.
> > Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#174
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
a modified one.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E496.70035A5F@***.net...
> An '97 LS1 Corvette:
> http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> > seconds 87.360 mph.
> > Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E496.70035A5F@***.net...
> An '97 LS1 Corvette:
> http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> > seconds 87.360 mph.
> > Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#175
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
a modified one.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E496.70035A5F@***.net...
> An '97 LS1 Corvette:
> http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> > seconds 87.360 mph.
> > Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E496.70035A5F@***.net...
> An '97 LS1 Corvette:
> http://home.comcast.net/~bowerygirl/...c5r-877web.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > The only figures I can find for the 1/8 mile for the BMW M5 are 8.227
> > seconds 87.360 mph.
> > Anyhow, I'm bored of this now.. believe what you will.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#176
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jack Carter wrote:
>
> All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9. Have to
> admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in the
> automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jack Carter wrote:
>
> All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9. Have to
> admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in the
> automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
#177
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jack Carter wrote:
>
> All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9. Have to
> admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in the
> automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jack Carter wrote:
>
> All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9. Have to
> admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in the
> automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
#178
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jack Carter wrote:
>
> All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9. Have to
> admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in the
> automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jack Carter wrote:
>
> All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9. Have to
> admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in the
> automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
#179
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Consistent G-Tech times of 6.7 and 6.8 aren't what I'd call "falls on its
face" times. Best I ever got out of my 5.9 was 7 flat.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E5E5.9CE78E7A@***.net...
> In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
> the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jack Carter wrote:
> >
> > All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> > I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9.
Have to
> > admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in
the
> > automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> > torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
face" times. Best I ever got out of my 5.9 was 7 flat.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E5E5.9CE78E7A@***.net...
> In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
> the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jack Carter wrote:
> >
> > All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> > I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9.
Have to
> > admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in
the
> > automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> > torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
#180
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.jeepscanada.com/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Consistent G-Tech times of 6.7 and 6.8 aren't what I'd call "falls on its
face" times. Best I ever got out of my 5.9 was 7 flat.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E5E5.9CE78E7A@***.net...
> In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
> the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jack Carter wrote:
> >
> > All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> > I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9.
Have to
> > admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in
the
> > automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> > torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.
face" times. Best I ever got out of my 5.9 was 7 flat.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41A4E5E5.9CE78E7A@***.net...
> In your dreams! The Wife has one of those, it just feels good with
> the initial jerk of 3.73 gears, after that if falls on it's face.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jack Carter wrote:
> >
> > All of this talk and nobody has even mentioned the GC late model 4.7 HO.
> > I've got one that that runs better 0-60 times than my "old" '98 5.9.
Have to
> > admit that it seems like some of it might be due to a big difference in
the
> > automatic transmissions. The '04 seems to have a much higher RPM stall
> > torque converter which lets come off the line like a rocket ship.