Jeep JT....er I mean J8?
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Jeep JT....er I mean J8?
When I first saw the Jeep JT earlier in the year, I thought it looked
a little like a military vehicle. I guess I know why now. Seems it
was based off one/designed to be one. I just read that Jeep is
getting back into the military business with the Jeep J8 military
vehicle. I'm all for the JT/J8 being a military truck... as long as
they still come out with a civilian version of it. I've put a picture
of it here for anyone interested: http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Tim J.
----------------------------------------
'84 CJ7 w/SBC 305 conversion
www.4x4owners.com
a little like a military vehicle. I guess I know why now. Seems it
was based off one/designed to be one. I just read that Jeep is
getting back into the military business with the Jeep J8 military
vehicle. I'm all for the JT/J8 being a military truck... as long as
they still come out with a civilian version of it. I've put a picture
of it here for anyone interested: http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Tim J.
----------------------------------------
'84 CJ7 w/SBC 305 conversion
www.4x4owners.com
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep JT....er I mean J8?
Tim J <timothyljanssen@gmail.com> wrote in news:1189791940.631062.234380
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep JT....er I mean J8?
Tim J <timothyljanssen@gmail.com> wrote in news:1189791940.631062.234380
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep JT....er I mean J8?
Tim J <timothyljanssen@gmail.com> wrote in news:1189791940.631062.234380
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep JT....er I mean J8?
Tim J <timothyljanssen@gmail.com> wrote in news:1189791940.631062.234380
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
> http://www.4x4owners.com/content/view/72/2/
Diesel engine looks like 295 ft/lb of torque... Now I'll take THAT
engine!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)