Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:55:57 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
except with your standard BS below!
Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
:> See another example of taking responsibility for one's actions. An
:>impossibility ofr cowards too afraid to use a real name and address.
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>> Must be a new experience for you, thinking I mean!
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
except with your standard BS below!
Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
:> See another example of taking responsibility for one's actions. An
:>impossibility ofr cowards too afraid to use a real name and address.
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>> Must be a new experience for you, thinking I mean!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:55:57 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
except with your standard BS below!
Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
:> See another example of taking responsibility for one's actions. An
:>impossibility ofr cowards too afraid to use a real name and address.
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>> Must be a new experience for you, thinking I mean!
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
except with your standard BS below!
Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
:> See another example of taking responsibility for one's actions. An
:>impossibility ofr cowards too afraid to use a real name and address.
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>> Must be a new experience for you, thinking I mean!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:55:57 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
except with your standard BS below!
Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
:> See another example of taking responsibility for one's actions. An
:>impossibility ofr cowards too afraid to use a real name and address.
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>> Must be a new experience for you, thinking I mean!
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
except with your standard BS below!
Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
:> See another example of taking responsibility for one's actions. An
:>impossibility ofr cowards too afraid to use a real name and address.
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>> Must be a new experience for you, thinking I mean!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"24BitŪ" wrote:
>
>
> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
> except with your standard BS below!
> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"24BitŪ" wrote:
>
>
> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
> except with your standard BS below!
> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"24BitŪ" wrote:
>
>
> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
> except with your standard BS below!
> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"24BitŪ" wrote:
>
>
> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
> except with your standard BS below!
> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"24BitŪ" wrote:
>
>
> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
> except with your standard BS below!
> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"24BitŪ" wrote:
>
>
> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
> except with your standard BS below!
> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:42:59 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Not at 2am in the morning, but then again you do strange things!
And there you go again, trying to change the subject at hand!
Would you like a repost so you can get back to the allegations?
:> I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>>
:>> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
:>> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
:>> except with your standard BS below!
:>> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Not at 2am in the morning, but then again you do strange things!
And there you go again, trying to change the subject at hand!
Would you like a repost so you can get back to the allegations?
:> I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>>
:>> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
:>> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
:>> except with your standard BS below!
:>> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:42:59 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Not at 2am in the morning, but then again you do strange things!
And there you go again, trying to change the subject at hand!
Would you like a repost so you can get back to the allegations?
:> I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>>
:>> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
:>> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
:>> except with your standard BS below!
:>> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Not at 2am in the morning, but then again you do strange things!
And there you go again, trying to change the subject at hand!
Would you like a repost so you can get back to the allegations?
:> I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>>
:>> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
:>> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
:>> except with your standard BS below!
:>> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:42:59 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Not at 2am in the morning, but then again you do strange things!
And there you go again, trying to change the subject at hand!
Would you like a repost so you can get back to the allegations?
:> I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>>
:>> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
:>> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
:>> except with your standard BS below!
:>> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
<----------@***.net> Amazingly Replied without Prejudice below:
Not at 2am in the morning, but then again you do strange things!
And there you go again, trying to change the subject at hand!
Would you like a repost so you can get back to the allegations?
:> I thought I go fishing, you ever go deep sea fishing?
:>
:>"24BitŪ" wrote:
:>>
:>>
:>> Just thought I'd follow you here because you ran off so fast from
:>> A.B.P.A. and wondered why you didn't answer the questions I had asked
:>> except with your standard BS below!
:>> Shell we get back to it, or you going to run off again?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep CJ7 Mopar MPFI - Failed California Smog Test
In message <5tednX-pnK9Uyi_ZnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@ez2.net>, "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
>
>"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:0fGdndBxBuElpyzZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@comcast.com ...
>> Pretty much anything that raises the combustion temperature is a suspect
>> for high NOX.
>
>
>High temps _lower_ the NOX.
_Wrong_ NOx is formed when combustion temp is high.
>
>
>
>
>
>Crapped out cat, possibly just running too lean. If a
>> good run takes it under the limit, figure you'll want to check/replace the
>> cat before the next bi-annual.
>
>I agree with that.
>
>
>
>The smog stations are supposed to
>> let the engine cool down before testing, but even the test only stations
>> seem to want you in and out asap.
'Cool down' is a bit misleading. They don't want you 'preconditioning' the
vehicle by trying to heat up the cat, but the vehicle needs to be tested at
normal operating temperature. So, you're supposed to let it idle until up to
temp. The idea is that they've allowed enough time in the test for the cat to
'heat up' while the loaded mode test is running. If it doesn't, there's
something wrong.
A 'cool' cat converter is a sure way to fail for high NOx emissions, since the
cat needs to be hot to rip the nitrogen loose from the oxygen. Too much O2 can
also reduce the cat's ability to reduce NOx, so an exhaust leak upstream of the
cat can cause problems too.
>>
>
>My car failed the low speed test, but passed the high speed test. It left me
>wondering why they do the low speed first on a cold engine when if they do
>the test on a hot engine, it will pass. If the high speed test was done
>first, the engine would come to temp and pass on the low speed test.
The engine is supposed to be at normal operating temp before the test begins.
>
>
>
>
>"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:0fGdndBxBuElpyzZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@comcast.com ...
>> Pretty much anything that raises the combustion temperature is a suspect
>> for high NOX.
>
>
>High temps _lower_ the NOX.
_Wrong_ NOx is formed when combustion temp is high.
>
>
>
>
>
>Crapped out cat, possibly just running too lean. If a
>> good run takes it under the limit, figure you'll want to check/replace the
>> cat before the next bi-annual.
>
>I agree with that.
>
>
>
>The smog stations are supposed to
>> let the engine cool down before testing, but even the test only stations
>> seem to want you in and out asap.
'Cool down' is a bit misleading. They don't want you 'preconditioning' the
vehicle by trying to heat up the cat, but the vehicle needs to be tested at
normal operating temperature. So, you're supposed to let it idle until up to
temp. The idea is that they've allowed enough time in the test for the cat to
'heat up' while the loaded mode test is running. If it doesn't, there's
something wrong.
A 'cool' cat converter is a sure way to fail for high NOx emissions, since the
cat needs to be hot to rip the nitrogen loose from the oxygen. Too much O2 can
also reduce the cat's ability to reduce NOx, so an exhaust leak upstream of the
cat can cause problems too.
>>
>
>My car failed the low speed test, but passed the high speed test. It left me
>wondering why they do the low speed first on a cold engine when if they do
>the test on a hot engine, it will pass. If the high speed test was done
>first, the engine would come to temp and pass on the low speed test.
The engine is supposed to be at normal operating temp before the test begins.
>
>
>