Interesting question
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
Hi Bill,
Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
enough.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>
> Which meal did you prefer?
Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
enough.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>
> Which meal did you prefer?
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
Hi Bill,
Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
enough.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>
> Which meal did you prefer?
Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
enough.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>
> Which meal did you prefer?
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
Hi Bill,
Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
enough.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>
> Which meal did you prefer?
Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
enough.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>
> Which meal did you prefer?
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
That was the 'chopped ham and egg' which was in the breakfast or dinner
rations.
How much did you weigh after that 45 days? Those rations were 3000 calories
mostly from saturated fat. On the plus side you got 4 cigarettes you could
trade away.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:45378C7C.A2C91590@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
> remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
> enough.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>>
>> Which meal did you prefer?
rations.
How much did you weigh after that 45 days? Those rations were 3000 calories
mostly from saturated fat. On the plus side you got 4 cigarettes you could
trade away.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:45378C7C.A2C91590@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
> remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
> enough.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>>
>> Which meal did you prefer?
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
That was the 'chopped ham and egg' which was in the breakfast or dinner
rations.
How much did you weigh after that 45 days? Those rations were 3000 calories
mostly from saturated fat. On the plus side you got 4 cigarettes you could
trade away.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:45378C7C.A2C91590@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
> remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
> enough.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>>
>> Which meal did you prefer?
rations.
How much did you weigh after that 45 days? Those rations were 3000 calories
mostly from saturated fat. On the plus side you got 4 cigarettes you could
trade away.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:45378C7C.A2C91590@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
> remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
> enough.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>>
>> Which meal did you prefer?
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
That was the 'chopped ham and egg' which was in the breakfast or dinner
rations.
How much did you weigh after that 45 days? Those rations were 3000 calories
mostly from saturated fat. On the plus side you got 4 cigarettes you could
trade away.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:45378C7C.A2C91590@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
> remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
> enough.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>>
>> Which meal did you prefer?
rations.
How much did you weigh after that 45 days? Those rations were 3000 calories
mostly from saturated fat. On the plus side you got 4 cigarettes you could
trade away.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:45378C7C.A2C91590@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> Fortunately I can only remember the good in the good old days. I do
> remember the lard would separate into white modules if it wasn't hot
> enough.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> And sick the whole time from what you were eating......
>>
>> Which meal did you prefer?
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I wouldn't, most Jeep use one or two frame mounts forward of the
> tub, and there are no straight pieces in the fenders to use as a strut,
> hold the radiator away from the fan, just torquing over an uneven ditch
> could punch the radiator. And haven't you had a tree jump out in front
> of you, while off roading?
That makes sense. I took a good look: other than a few spot welds and
those struts, there isn't much holding the grille away from the engine
fan. Torque it good or bump a tree (as you said), and things could get
ugly in the middle of BFE.
I left it as is. I figured they were there for a reason. I'm tempted
to have something more substantial fabricated and fitted instead, say,
5/8" black powder-coated chrome moly with decent welded supports for the
firewall side and a removable crossover. Would probably strengthen the
entire front end and look nice too. Good winter project.
> I wouldn't, most Jeep use one or two frame mounts forward of the
> tub, and there are no straight pieces in the fenders to use as a strut,
> hold the radiator away from the fan, just torquing over an uneven ditch
> could punch the radiator. And haven't you had a tree jump out in front
> of you, while off roading?
That makes sense. I took a good look: other than a few spot welds and
those struts, there isn't much holding the grille away from the engine
fan. Torque it good or bump a tree (as you said), and things could get
ugly in the middle of BFE.
I left it as is. I figured they were there for a reason. I'm tempted
to have something more substantial fabricated and fitted instead, say,
5/8" black powder-coated chrome moly with decent welded supports for the
firewall side and a removable crossover. Would probably strengthen the
entire front end and look nice too. Good winter project.
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I wouldn't, most Jeep use one or two frame mounts forward of the
> tub, and there are no straight pieces in the fenders to use as a strut,
> hold the radiator away from the fan, just torquing over an uneven ditch
> could punch the radiator. And haven't you had a tree jump out in front
> of you, while off roading?
That makes sense. I took a good look: other than a few spot welds and
those struts, there isn't much holding the grille away from the engine
fan. Torque it good or bump a tree (as you said), and things could get
ugly in the middle of BFE.
I left it as is. I figured they were there for a reason. I'm tempted
to have something more substantial fabricated and fitted instead, say,
5/8" black powder-coated chrome moly with decent welded supports for the
firewall side and a removable crossover. Would probably strengthen the
entire front end and look nice too. Good winter project.
> I wouldn't, most Jeep use one or two frame mounts forward of the
> tub, and there are no straight pieces in the fenders to use as a strut,
> hold the radiator away from the fan, just torquing over an uneven ditch
> could punch the radiator. And haven't you had a tree jump out in front
> of you, while off roading?
That makes sense. I took a good look: other than a few spot welds and
those struts, there isn't much holding the grille away from the engine
fan. Torque it good or bump a tree (as you said), and things could get
ugly in the middle of BFE.
I left it as is. I figured they were there for a reason. I'm tempted
to have something more substantial fabricated and fitted instead, say,
5/8" black powder-coated chrome moly with decent welded supports for the
firewall side and a removable crossover. Would probably strengthen the
entire front end and look nice too. Good winter project.
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Interesting question
L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I wouldn't, most Jeep use one or two frame mounts forward of the
> tub, and there are no straight pieces in the fenders to use as a strut,
> hold the radiator away from the fan, just torquing over an uneven ditch
> could punch the radiator. And haven't you had a tree jump out in front
> of you, while off roading?
That makes sense. I took a good look: other than a few spot welds and
those struts, there isn't much holding the grille away from the engine
fan. Torque it good or bump a tree (as you said), and things could get
ugly in the middle of BFE.
I left it as is. I figured they were there for a reason. I'm tempted
to have something more substantial fabricated and fitted instead, say,
5/8" black powder-coated chrome moly with decent welded supports for the
firewall side and a removable crossover. Would probably strengthen the
entire front end and look nice too. Good winter project.
> I wouldn't, most Jeep use one or two frame mounts forward of the
> tub, and there are no straight pieces in the fenders to use as a strut,
> hold the radiator away from the fan, just torquing over an uneven ditch
> could punch the radiator. And haven't you had a tree jump out in front
> of you, while off roading?
That makes sense. I took a good look: other than a few spot welds and
those struts, there isn't much holding the grille away from the engine
fan. Torque it good or bump a tree (as you said), and things could get
ugly in the middle of BFE.
I left it as is. I figured they were there for a reason. I'm tempted
to have something more substantial fabricated and fitted instead, say,
5/8" black powder-coated chrome moly with decent welded supports for the
firewall side and a removable crossover. Would probably strengthen the
entire front end and look nice too. Good winter project.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)