Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > The issue I was discussing was the changing of the definiton of marriage
> > to satisfy everyone's desires
>
> Slippery-slope arguments have never held much persuasive or logical
> weight.
>
> > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
>
> And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> any reality.
Why is it a slippery slope argument?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > The issue I was discussing was the changing of the definiton of marriage
> > to satisfy everyone's desires
>
> Slippery-slope arguments have never held much persuasive or logical
> weight.
>
> > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
>
> And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> any reality.
Why is it a slippery slope argument?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
> > The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
> > defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
> By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
> psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
"Most folks." Like Lloyd, perhaps?
The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the type
of activity they each engage in, unless you know of other differences
unrelated to sexuality.
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
> > The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
> > defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
> By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
> psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
"Most folks." Like Lloyd, perhaps?
The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the type
of activity they each engage in, unless you know of other differences
unrelated to sexuality.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
> > The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
> > defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
> By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
> psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
"Most folks." Like Lloyd, perhaps?
The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the type
of activity they each engage in, unless you know of other differences
unrelated to sexuality.
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
> > The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
> > defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
> By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
> psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
"Most folks." Like Lloyd, perhaps?
The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the type
of activity they each engage in, unless you know of other differences
unrelated to sexuality.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
> > The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
> > defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
> By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
> psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
"Most folks." Like Lloyd, perhaps?
The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the type
of activity they each engage in, unless you know of other differences
unrelated to sexuality.
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
> > The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
> > defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
> By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
> psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
"Most folks." Like Lloyd, perhaps?
The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the type
of activity they each engage in, unless you know of other differences
unrelated to sexuality.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> > > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
> > And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> > any reality.
> Why is it a slippery slope argument?
If you don't know the definition of a slippery-slope argument, go look it
up. I am not your debate coach.
DS
> > > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
> > And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> > any reality.
> Why is it a slippery slope argument?
If you don't know the definition of a slippery-slope argument, go look it
up. I am not your debate coach.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> > > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
> > And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> > any reality.
> Why is it a slippery slope argument?
If you don't know the definition of a slippery-slope argument, go look it
up. I am not your debate coach.
DS
> > > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
> > And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> > any reality.
> Why is it a slippery slope argument?
If you don't know the definition of a slippery-slope argument, go look it
up. I am not your debate coach.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> > > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
> > And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> > any reality.
> Why is it a slippery slope argument?
If you don't know the definition of a slippery-slope argument, go look it
up. I am not your debate coach.
DS
> > > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
> > And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> > any reality.
> Why is it a slippery slope argument?
If you don't know the definition of a slippery-slope argument, go look it
up. I am not your debate coach.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the
> type of activity they each engage in
Repetition does not bolster this statement's validity.
> unless you know of other differences unrelated to sexuality.
The gender of people with whom homosexuals fall in love with...?
DS
> The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the
> type of activity they each engage in
Repetition does not bolster this statement's validity.
> unless you know of other differences unrelated to sexuality.
The gender of people with whom homosexuals fall in love with...?
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the
> type of activity they each engage in
Repetition does not bolster this statement's validity.
> unless you know of other differences unrelated to sexuality.
The gender of people with whom homosexuals fall in love with...?
DS
> The defining difference between homosexuals and heterosexuals is the
> type of activity they each engage in
Repetition does not bolster this statement's validity.
> unless you know of other differences unrelated to sexuality.
The gender of people with whom homosexuals fall in love with...?
DS
