Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <vsur9s30fp9c43@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> Stern wrote:
>> > ...at *substantially* higher cost, start to finish, whether that cost was
>> > directly to me for treatment, surgery and meds or indirectly via insurance
>> > premiums.
>> or taxes for that purpose should the USA adopt such a system.
> Exactly. Actual costs for National healthcare equal to what we have now
> would be higher than current costs. To see lower costs you will see reduced
> levels of patient care.
Or both. I imagine the same processes that do everything in US government.
We are talking about handing over health care to the same people that
give us a poor return on our money with things like 55mph speed limits,
red light cameras, shoddy roads, CAFE, and all sorts of other regulations
and poorly done jobs that are worse than doing nothing at all. Why does
anyone really want these people running health care too?
> "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> Stern wrote:
>> > ...at *substantially* higher cost, start to finish, whether that cost was
>> > directly to me for treatment, surgery and meds or indirectly via insurance
>> > premiums.
>> or taxes for that purpose should the USA adopt such a system.
> Exactly. Actual costs for National healthcare equal to what we have now
> would be higher than current costs. To see lower costs you will see reduced
> levels of patient care.
Or both. I imagine the same processes that do everything in US government.
We are talking about handing over health care to the same people that
give us a poor return on our money with things like 55mph speed limits,
red light cameras, shoddy roads, CAFE, and all sorts of other regulations
and poorly done jobs that are worse than doing nothing at all. Why does
anyone really want these people running health care too?
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <vsur9s30fp9c43@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> Stern wrote:
>> > ...at *substantially* higher cost, start to finish, whether that cost was
>> > directly to me for treatment, surgery and meds or indirectly via insurance
>> > premiums.
>> or taxes for that purpose should the USA adopt such a system.
> Exactly. Actual costs for National healthcare equal to what we have now
> would be higher than current costs. To see lower costs you will see reduced
> levels of patient care.
Or both. I imagine the same processes that do everything in US government.
We are talking about handing over health care to the same people that
give us a poor return on our money with things like 55mph speed limits,
red light cameras, shoddy roads, CAFE, and all sorts of other regulations
and poorly done jobs that are worse than doing nothing at all. Why does
anyone really want these people running health care too?
> "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> Stern wrote:
>> > ...at *substantially* higher cost, start to finish, whether that cost was
>> > directly to me for treatment, surgery and meds or indirectly via insurance
>> > premiums.
>> or taxes for that purpose should the USA adopt such a system.
> Exactly. Actual costs for National healthcare equal to what we have now
> would be higher than current costs. To see lower costs you will see reduced
> levels of patient care.
Or both. I imagine the same processes that do everything in US government.
We are talking about handing over health care to the same people that
give us a poor return on our money with things like 55mph speed limits,
red light cameras, shoddy roads, CAFE, and all sorts of other regulations
and poorly done jobs that are worse than doing nothing at all. Why does
anyone really want these people running health care too?
Guest
Posts: n/a
C. E. White wrote:
> "Can't you three or four guys that are continuing this thread find some common
> group to post to, rather than all of this crossposting?
>
> Try alt.argumentative.idiots.wont.give.up"
>
> Dan Gates wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
I know, BUT .. .. I .. .. JUST .. .. COULDN'T .. .. HELP .. .. MYSELF.
Even as I was replying, I was thinking the same thing you were but, but,
but,
|>)
Dan
> "Can't you three or four guys that are continuing this thread find some common
> group to post to, rather than all of this crossposting?
>
> Try alt.argumentative.idiots.wont.give.up"
>
> Dan Gates wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
I know, BUT .. .. I .. .. JUST .. .. COULDN'T .. .. HELP .. .. MYSELF.
Even as I was replying, I was thinking the same thing you were but, but,
but,
|>)
Dan
Guest
Posts: n/a
C. E. White wrote:
> "Can't you three or four guys that are continuing this thread find some common
> group to post to, rather than all of this crossposting?
>
> Try alt.argumentative.idiots.wont.give.up"
>
> Dan Gates wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
I know, BUT .. .. I .. .. JUST .. .. COULDN'T .. .. HELP .. .. MYSELF.
Even as I was replying, I was thinking the same thing you were but, but,
but,
|>)
Dan
> "Can't you three or four guys that are continuing this thread find some common
> group to post to, rather than all of this crossposting?
>
> Try alt.argumentative.idiots.wont.give.up"
>
> Dan Gates wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
I know, BUT .. .. I .. .. JUST .. .. COULDN'T .. .. HELP .. .. MYSELF.
Even as I was replying, I was thinking the same thing you were but, but,
but,
|>)
Dan
Guest
Posts: n/a
C. E. White wrote:
> "Can't you three or four guys that are continuing this thread find some common
> group to post to, rather than all of this crossposting?
>
> Try alt.argumentative.idiots.wont.give.up"
>
> Dan Gates wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
I know, BUT .. .. I .. .. JUST .. .. COULDN'T .. .. HELP .. .. MYSELF.
Even as I was replying, I was thinking the same thing you were but, but,
but,
|>)
Dan
> "Can't you three or four guys that are continuing this thread find some common
> group to post to, rather than all of this crossposting?
>
> Try alt.argumentative.idiots.wont.give.up"
>
> Dan Gates wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>>
I know, BUT .. .. I .. .. JUST .. .. COULDN'T .. .. HELP .. .. MYSELF.
Even as I was replying, I was thinking the same thing you were but, but,
but,
|>)
Dan
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <auadnZZDP9zV8lKiRVn-iQ@magma.ca>,
Dan Gates <dgates@kellerengineering.com> wrote:
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Dan Gates <dgates@kellerengineering.com> wrote:
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <auadnZZDP9zV8lKiRVn-iQ@magma.ca>,
Dan Gates <dgates@kellerengineering.com> wrote:
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Dan Gates <dgates@kellerengineering.com> wrote:
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <auadnZZDP9zV8lKiRVn-iQ@magma.ca>,
Dan Gates <dgates@kellerengineering.com> wrote:
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Dan Gates <dgates@kellerengineering.com> wrote:
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <RfKzb.419548$HS4.3342099@attbi_s01>,
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:.
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:.
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <RfKzb.419548$HS4.3342099@attbi_s01>,
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:.
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:.
..
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


