Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to get
> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality.
>
> Totally false.

True. I personally witnessed this while actively spending over a year
on an internet forum strictly for parents of a certain childhood form of
cancer. There were people from all over the world on there, but
particularly the U.S., Canada, and Britain. The gross malpractice that
we witnessed on children in Canada due to its metered out healthcare was
atrocious. The U.S. was the mecca of successful treatment.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to get
> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality.
>
> Totally false.

True. I personally witnessed this while actively spending over a year
on an internet forum strictly for parents of a certain childhood form of
cancer. There were people from all over the world on there, but
particularly the U.S., Canada, and Britain. The gross malpractice that
we witnessed on children in Canada due to its metered out healthcare was
atrocious. The U.S. was the mecca of successful treatment.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to get
> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality.
>
> Totally false.

True. I personally witnessed this while actively spending over a year
on an internet forum strictly for parents of a certain childhood form of
cancer. There were people from all over the world on there, but
particularly the U.S., Canada, and Britain. The gross malpractice that
we witnessed on children in Canada due to its metered out healthcare was
atrocious. The U.S. was the mecca of successful treatment.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> And yet they cover everybody and most of them have longer life spans and less
> infant mortality than the US. By any measure, those countries are healthier.

I can refer you to the parents of childhood cancer victims that would
disagree with you.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> And yet they cover everybody and most of them have longer life spans and less
> infant mortality than the US. By any measure, those countries are healthier.

I can refer you to the parents of childhood cancer victims that would
disagree with you.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> And yet they cover everybody and most of them have longer life spans and less
> infant mortality than the US. By any measure, those countries are healthier.

I can refer you to the parents of childhood cancer victims that would
disagree with you.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

z wrote:
>
> ...It all started with that
> sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
> did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.

Oh? And where would that be stated. As the cliché says: "Chapter and
verse, please."

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

z wrote:
>
> ...It all started with that
> sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
> did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.

Oh? And where would that be stated. As the cliché says: "Chapter and
verse, please."

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

z wrote:
>
> ...It all started with that
> sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
> did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.

Oh? And where would that be stated. As the cliché says: "Chapter and
verse, please."

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

Lloyd Parker wrote:

> In article <MK5zb.46$rE3.8@twister.socal.rr.com>,
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >> Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> >> >> say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> >> >> capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> >> >> middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> >> >> Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
> >> >
> >> >This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side
> >of
> >> >morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree
> >with
> >> >the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to)
> >then
> >> >you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> >> >personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> >> >like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
> >>
> >> Spoken like a good little creationist.
> >>
> >
> >Who? Me? I don't buy into "Creation Science". But the lefts redefinition
> >of "morality" and "science" is no different than what Creationists do to
> >force fit science into Genesis. Only it's force fit of science (and
> >religion) into anti-capitalism.
>
> No, you reject facts that don't fit your dogma. That's creationism.
>
> >
> >> >
> >> >The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> >> >Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> >> >corporations".
> >> >
> >> >
> >> And the folks standing behind you and your ilk are Fascists and *****.
> >Want
> >> to call names? OK.
> >
> >Not at all. When you see who shows up to those anti-globalist
> >(anti-corporate) demonstrations you see Socialist signs and booths all over
> >the place. No "name" calling was intended. And if you're looking for nasty
> >names to fit conservatives, you're really missing the mark with Fascist and
> >****. Those are on the opposite side of the political spectrum, away from
> >limited government.
>
> So are conservatives -- telling people what kind of --- to have, what genders
> can marry, what a woman can do with her body, etc.

Since when to conservatives as an aggregate tell people what kind of --- to
have??? You're posting from an alternate reality again.