Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <TM9ub.174022$275.554498@attbi_s53>,
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>
>>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
>a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
>else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
>needing to perform for those funds?
I consider it about equal to lying like you're doing.
>
>What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
>were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
>a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
>go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
>easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
>instead.
>
Bought how?
>I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
>work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
>hand stuff over for cash.
>
>
>
>
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>
>>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
>a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
>else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
>needing to perform for those funds?
I consider it about equal to lying like you're doing.
>
>What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
>were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
>a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
>go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
>easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
>instead.
>
Bought how?
>I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
>work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
>hand stuff over for cash.
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <TM9ub.174022$275.554498@attbi_s53>,
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>
>>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
>a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
>else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
>needing to perform for those funds?
I consider it about equal to lying like you're doing.
>
>What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
>were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
>a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
>go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
>easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
>instead.
>
Bought how?
>I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
>work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
>hand stuff over for cash.
>
>
>
>
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>
>>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
>a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
>else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
>needing to perform for those funds?
I consider it about equal to lying like you're doing.
>
>What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
>were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
>a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
>go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
>easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
>instead.
>
Bought how?
>I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
>work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
>hand stuff over for cash.
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <TM9ub.174022$275.554498@attbi_s53>,
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>
>>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
>a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
>else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
>needing to perform for those funds?
I consider it about equal to lying like you're doing.
>
>What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
>were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
>a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
>go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
>easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
>instead.
>
Bought how?
>I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
>work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
>hand stuff over for cash.
>
>
>
>
tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>
>>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
>a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
>else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
>needing to perform for those funds?
I consider it about equal to lying like you're doing.
>
>What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
>were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
>a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
>go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
>easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
>instead.
>
Bought how?
>I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
>work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
>hand stuff over for cash.
>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net>, Steve <no@spam.thanks> wrote:
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
>Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
>
Urban myth. A Sudanese man claimed he could deliver bin Laden. Turned out he
couldn't.
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
>Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
>
Urban myth. A Sudanese man claimed he could deliver bin Laden. Turned out he
couldn't.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net>, Steve <no@spam.thanks> wrote:
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
>Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
>
Urban myth. A Sudanese man claimed he could deliver bin Laden. Turned out he
couldn't.
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
>Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
>
Urban myth. A Sudanese man claimed he could deliver bin Laden. Turned out he
couldn't.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net>, Steve <no@spam.thanks> wrote:
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
>Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
>
Urban myth. A Sudanese man claimed he could deliver bin Laden. Turned out he
couldn't.
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>
>>
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
>Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
>
Urban myth. A Sudanese man claimed he could deliver bin Laden. Turned out he
couldn't.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <3fb994f4_8@corp.newsgroups.com>, "Steve W." <me@home.org> wrote:
>
>"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
>news:PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net...
>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>>
>> Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>> any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have
>captured
>> Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>>
>>
>They didn't need a Chinese spy when Klinton was in, he handed them
>anything they wanted straight out of the safe. Don't need a spy when a
>Komrade holds the office.... Especially when your paying for the guys
>election...
>
If you're referring to missile and defense tech, I suggest you read the ***
report.
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
>
>"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
>news:PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net...
>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>>
>> Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>> any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have
>captured
>> Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>>
>>
>They didn't need a Chinese spy when Klinton was in, he handed them
>anything they wanted straight out of the safe. Don't need a spy when a
>Komrade holds the office.... Especially when your paying for the guys
>election...
>
If you're referring to missile and defense tech, I suggest you read the ***
report.
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <3fb994f4_8@corp.newsgroups.com>, "Steve W." <me@home.org> wrote:
>
>"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
>news:PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net...
>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>>
>> Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>> any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have
>captured
>> Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>>
>>
>They didn't need a Chinese spy when Klinton was in, he handed them
>anything they wanted straight out of the safe. Don't need a spy when a
>Komrade holds the office.... Especially when your paying for the guys
>election...
>
If you're referring to missile and defense tech, I suggest you read the ***
report.
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
>
>"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
>news:PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net...
>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>>
>> Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>> any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have
>captured
>> Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>>
>>
>They didn't need a Chinese spy when Klinton was in, he handed them
>anything they wanted straight out of the safe. Don't need a spy when a
>Komrade holds the office.... Especially when your paying for the guys
>election...
>
If you're referring to missile and defense tech, I suggest you read the ***
report.
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <3fb994f4_8@corp.newsgroups.com>, "Steve W." <me@home.org> wrote:
>
>"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
>news:PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net...
>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>>
>> Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>> any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have
>captured
>> Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>>
>>
>They didn't need a Chinese spy when Klinton was in, he handed them
>anything they wanted straight out of the safe. Don't need a spy when a
>Komrade holds the office.... Especially when your paying for the guys
>election...
>
If you're referring to missile and defense tech, I suggest you read the ***
report.
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
>
>"Steve" <no@spam.thanks> wrote in message
>news:PPWdnbOwAtL0oySiRTvUrg@texas.net...
>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>>
>> Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
>> any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have
>captured
>> Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>>
>>
>They didn't need a Chinese spy when Klinton was in, he handed them
>anything they wanted straight out of the safe. Don't need a spy when a
>Komrade holds the office.... Especially when your paying for the guys
>election...
>
If you're referring to missile and defense tech, I suggest you read the ***
report.
>
>
>
>-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <Zmhub.8235$Wy4.392@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.n et>,
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <su8ub.5087$Rk5.2701@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bpar8i$k2h$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <gYVtb.33146$pE3.5099@twister.socal.rr.com>,
>> >> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >"Benjamin Lee" <benmlee@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> >> >news:XPStb.70809$Ec1.3910324@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > Do you think the people of Iran feel that way?
>> >> >> > > Do you think the people of Pakistan feel that way?
>> >> >> > > How about Afghanistan? Iraq?
>> >> >> > > Each of these countries *had* free democratic elections, but
>when
>> >they
>> >> >> > > elected governments whose foreign policies didn't agree with the
>> >US,
>> >> >> > > they ended up with coups d'etat funded by the US, and their
>freely
>> >> >> > > elected governments kicked out. This is not conspiracy theory,
>> >this
>> >> >> > > is history.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You're wrong about these countries having ever been free
>democratic
>> >> >> > societies with freely elected governments. I don't know what
>history
>> >> >book
>> >> >> > you read, but it ranks with mythology.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This year is the 50th annaversary of the CIA's overthrow of
>Democracy
>> >in
>> >> >> Iran.
>> >> >
>> >> >First of all, to describe what Iran had in the first half of the
>century
>> >as
>> >> >a democracy is a stretch beyond reason.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> For a brief time, Mossadeq, it was correct.
>> >>
>> >> >Also, to say that the CIA overthrew
>> >> >the government is wrong.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What would you call organizing a coup then?
>> >>
>> >> >It is true that the US supported the Monarchy (the
>> >> >Shah) in his struggle against the PM, Mossadeq, who was a Nationalist
>and
>> >a
>> >> >Secularist. Here again is proof that many non-aligned nations at the
>> >onset
>> >> >of the cold war played east against west. Mossadeq was courting favor
>> >with
>> >> >the Tudeh (the outlawed Communist party supported by the Soviets)
>because
>> >it
>> >> >gave him leverage against the west (primarily Britain, secondarily the
>> >US).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
>them
>> >to
>> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>> >
>> >
>> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
>Al
>> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>> >
>> >
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>They didn't need one w/ your hero giving them all the technology they
>wanted.
>
>
Two words, right-wing fundamentalist: *** Report
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <su8ub.5087$Rk5.2701@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bpar8i$k2h$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <gYVtb.33146$pE3.5099@twister.socal.rr.com>,
>> >> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >"Benjamin Lee" <benmlee@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>> >> >news:XPStb.70809$Ec1.3910324@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > Do you think the people of Iran feel that way?
>> >> >> > > Do you think the people of Pakistan feel that way?
>> >> >> > > How about Afghanistan? Iraq?
>> >> >> > > Each of these countries *had* free democratic elections, but
>when
>> >they
>> >> >> > > elected governments whose foreign policies didn't agree with the
>> >US,
>> >> >> > > they ended up with coups d'etat funded by the US, and their
>freely
>> >> >> > > elected governments kicked out. This is not conspiracy theory,
>> >this
>> >> >> > > is history.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You're wrong about these countries having ever been free
>democratic
>> >> >> > societies with freely elected governments. I don't know what
>history
>> >> >book
>> >> >> > you read, but it ranks with mythology.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This year is the 50th annaversary of the CIA's overthrow of
>Democracy
>> >in
>> >> >> Iran.
>> >> >
>> >> >First of all, to describe what Iran had in the first half of the
>century
>> >as
>> >> >a democracy is a stretch beyond reason.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> For a brief time, Mossadeq, it was correct.
>> >>
>> >> >Also, to say that the CIA overthrew
>> >> >the government is wrong.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What would you call organizing a coup then?
>> >>
>> >> >It is true that the US supported the Monarchy (the
>> >> >Shah) in his struggle against the PM, Mossadeq, who was a Nationalist
>and
>> >a
>> >> >Secularist. Here again is proof that many non-aligned nations at the
>> >onset
>> >> >of the cold war played east against west. Mossadeq was courting favor
>> >with
>> >> >the Tudeh (the outlawed Communist party supported by the Soviets)
>because
>> >it
>> >> >gave him leverage against the west (primarily Britain, secondarily the
>> >US).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
>them
>> >to
>> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>> >
>> >
>> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
>Al
>> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
>> >
>> >
>> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
>
>They didn't need one w/ your hero giving them all the technology they
>wanted.
>
>
Two words, right-wing fundamentalist: *** Report
