Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> >>
> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
them
> >to
> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
> >
> >
> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
Al
> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> >
> >
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
How do you know that?
> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
them
> >to
> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
> >
> >
> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
Al
> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> >
> >
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
How do you know that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> >>
> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
them
> >to
> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
> >
> >
> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
Al
> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> >
> >
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
How do you know that?
> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
them
> >to
> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
> >
> >
> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
Al
> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> >
> >
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
How do you know that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> >>
> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
them
> >to
> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
> >
> >
> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
Al
> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> >
> >
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
How do you know that?
> >> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for
them
> >to
> >> help groups try to overthrow the US government?
> >
> >
> >Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
> >Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and
Al
> >had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> >
> >
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
How do you know that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
sure they did. his name was bill clinton.
now, go die bitter, cold, and alone.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
sure they did. his name was bill clinton.
now, go die bitter, cold, and alone.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
sure they did. his name was bill clinton.
now, go die bitter, cold, and alone.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
sure they did. his name was bill clinton.
now, go die bitter, cold, and alone.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
sure they did. his name was bill clinton.
now, go die bitter, cold, and alone.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
sure they did. his name was bill clinton.
now, go die bitter, cold, and alone.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
needing to perform for those funds?
What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
instead.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
hand stuff over for cash.
>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
needing to perform for those funds?
What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
instead.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
hand stuff over for cash.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
needing to perform for those funds?
What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
instead.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
hand stuff over for cash.
>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
needing to perform for those funds?
What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
instead.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
hand stuff over for cash.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <bpb4mp$13m$5@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
needing to perform for those funds?
What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
instead.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
hand stuff over for cash.
>>> So, if say China doesn't like the Republican party here, it's OK for them
>>to help groups try to overthrow the US government?
>>Kind of like China illegally donating money to AlGore's campaign and the
>>Democrats. I keep forgetting there wasn't any controlling authority and Al
>>had to take a leak from too much tea at the temple.
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Interesting, you consider being infiltrated by a chinese spy, having
a mole in the organization who is really there working for someone
else to be far worse than taking payment from the chinese and then
needing to perform for those funds?
What you are saying is that in order to find out what republicans
were doing the Chinese had to use traditional spying techniques and have
a mole work its way in. But the democrats, all the chinese had to do was
go to the top guys and give them some money. So the democrats were
easily bought, but the republicans couldn't be and had to be spied on
instead.
I don't know about you, but I'd rather require foreign nations to
work in spies to get low-level information than have the top people
hand stuff over for cash.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.
>
> At least the Dems didn't have a Chinese spy on the payroll!
Hell, the idiots didn't even have AMERICAN spies on the payroll! Or at
any rate they didn't pay attention to them, or else they'd have captured
Bin Laden when the Sudanese tried to *give* him to us in 1996.