Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> In article <3F92DF96.423518D7@lisahorton.net>,
> Lisa Horton <Lisa@lisahorton.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Bill Putney wrote:
> >>
> >> Dave Milne wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd rather incompetents were banned full stop.
> >>
> >> Repeating what I put in another post, the liberals would *never* allow
> >> that. Can't you hear their reasoning now: "By keeping an incompetent
> >> driver off the road, you would in effect be punishing his/her innocent
> >> children. Therefore it would be better to let the incompetent parents
> >> continue to drive without restriction. A few more people might be
> >> killed as a result, but at least the innocent children would not be
> >> punished."
> >>
> >
> >Nonsense. I'm definitely liberal, or beyond, and I strongly support
> >tougher licensing requirements.
> >
>
> Of course, right-wing radicals like Putney and bin Laden just have to spew
> hatred.

How clever, Lloyd. I'm still reeling from that one. 8^)

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

C. E. White wrote:

>
> Lisa Horton wrote:
>
>
>>Quite true of course. But a moron in an econobox represents a much
>>smaller danger than a moron in a behemoth.
>>
>>Lisa
>
>
> Care to cite any proof of this? I see more moron driving econoboxes making
> unsafe maneuvers in traffic than I see morons doing the same in SUVs. Two times
> this morning alone, I saw small cars force there way from the extreme left lane
> into the extreme right lane to make a last minute exit. I saw no SUVs doing
> this. So I conclude econobox morons are for more dangerous than SUV morons.
> Prove me wrong.
>
> Ed
>
>

An SUV performing the same unsafe maneuver is far more hazardous to
surrounding traffic. Surely even you can see that?

nate

--
remove "horny" from my email address to reply.

 

C. E. White wrote:

>
> Lisa Horton wrote:
>
>
>>Quite true of course. But a moron in an econobox represents a much
>>smaller danger than a moron in a behemoth.
>>
>>Lisa
>
>
> Care to cite any proof of this? I see more moron driving econoboxes making
> unsafe maneuvers in traffic than I see morons doing the same in SUVs. Two times
> this morning alone, I saw small cars force there way from the extreme left lane
> into the extreme right lane to make a last minute exit. I saw no SUVs doing
> this. So I conclude econobox morons are for more dangerous than SUV morons.
> Prove me wrong.
>
> Ed
>
>

An SUV performing the same unsafe maneuver is far more hazardous to
surrounding traffic. Surely even you can see that?

nate

--
remove "horny" from my email address to reply.

 

C. E. White wrote:

>
> Lisa Horton wrote:
>
>
>>Quite true of course. But a moron in an econobox represents a much
>>smaller danger than a moron in a behemoth.
>>
>>Lisa
>
>
> Care to cite any proof of this? I see more moron driving econoboxes making
> unsafe maneuvers in traffic than I see morons doing the same in SUVs. Two times
> this morning alone, I saw small cars force there way from the extreme left lane
> into the extreme right lane to make a last minute exit. I saw no SUVs doing
> this. So I conclude econobox morons are for more dangerous than SUV morons.
> Prove me wrong.
>
> Ed
>
>

An SUV performing the same unsafe maneuver is far more hazardous to
surrounding traffic. Surely even you can see that?

nate

--
remove "horny" from my email address to reply.

 

"Douglas A. Shrader" wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bn0u86$pdq$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >
> > Sure, just like Bush never came out and SAID Saddam was responsible for
> 9/11.
>
> That's true, he never once claimed that.

Yeah, but Lloyd thought it in his mind (funny how Bush, who is
supposedly dumb, is clever enough to make Lloyd, who is supposedly
brilliant, think things like that), so that makes it reality and
therefore Bush is guilty of it.

So, Lloyd, what about Sadam offering to and actually paying families of
homocide bombers as a reward? Does that make him a supporter of
terrorism and therefore a legitmate target in an all-out war on
terrorism? (Lloyd will come back with something suggesting that Bush is
evil and Sadam is good and innocent. Or he won't just to make me wrong;
but now he will because I said that; now he won't...)

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

"Douglas A. Shrader" wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bn0u86$pdq$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >
> > Sure, just like Bush never came out and SAID Saddam was responsible for
> 9/11.
>
> That's true, he never once claimed that.

Yeah, but Lloyd thought it in his mind (funny how Bush, who is
supposedly dumb, is clever enough to make Lloyd, who is supposedly
brilliant, think things like that), so that makes it reality and
therefore Bush is guilty of it.

So, Lloyd, what about Sadam offering to and actually paying families of
homocide bombers as a reward? Does that make him a supporter of
terrorism and therefore a legitmate target in an all-out war on
terrorism? (Lloyd will come back with something suggesting that Bush is
evil and Sadam is good and innocent. Or he won't just to make me wrong;
but now he will because I said that; now he won't...)

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

"Douglas A. Shrader" wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bn0u86$pdq$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >
> > Sure, just like Bush never came out and SAID Saddam was responsible for
> 9/11.
>
> That's true, he never once claimed that.

Yeah, but Lloyd thought it in his mind (funny how Bush, who is
supposedly dumb, is clever enough to make Lloyd, who is supposedly
brilliant, think things like that), so that makes it reality and
therefore Bush is guilty of it.

So, Lloyd, what about Sadam offering to and actually paying families of
homocide bombers as a reward? Does that make him a supporter of
terrorism and therefore a legitmate target in an all-out war on
terrorism? (Lloyd will come back with something suggesting that Bush is
evil and Sadam is good and innocent. Or he won't just to make me wrong;
but now he will because I said that; now he won't...)

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

CRWLR wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bn0v7b$pdq$20@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ...But most SUVs are used for solo commuting (note how few of them can drive
> in
> > an HOV lane), or running errands. Buying an 8-mpg behemoth for the one
> time a
> > year you may need to carry 8 people, as I said earlier, is like buying a
> Cray
> > supercomputer for your desktop just in case you need to decrypt a message
> from
> > Andromeda.
>
> I don't have any idea of what the guy or gal in the next lane was doing
> before they got into the next lane, or after they get out of it.
>
> I would agree that if I used an SUV the way I see many of them get used,
> they don't make much sense. But, what if the time I see them is when they
> are being used for the Exception Runs, instead of the Regular Use that the
> buyer had in mind when they bought the SUV?

You don't understand. Lloyd's used to seeing his elitist progressive
professor buddies driving their SUV's all over town, so he assumes
everyone else does that. Lloyd drives a Mercedes, so you can't accuse
him of that.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

CRWLR wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bn0v7b$pdq$20@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ...But most SUVs are used for solo commuting (note how few of them can drive
> in
> > an HOV lane), or running errands. Buying an 8-mpg behemoth for the one
> time a
> > year you may need to carry 8 people, as I said earlier, is like buying a
> Cray
> > supercomputer for your desktop just in case you need to decrypt a message
> from
> > Andromeda.
>
> I don't have any idea of what the guy or gal in the next lane was doing
> before they got into the next lane, or after they get out of it.
>
> I would agree that if I used an SUV the way I see many of them get used,
> they don't make much sense. But, what if the time I see them is when they
> are being used for the Exception Runs, instead of the Regular Use that the
> buyer had in mind when they bought the SUV?

You don't understand. Lloyd's used to seeing his elitist progressive
professor buddies driving their SUV's all over town, so he assumes
everyone else does that. Lloyd drives a Mercedes, so you can't accuse
him of that.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

 

CRWLR wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bn0v7b$pdq$20@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ...But most SUVs are used for solo commuting (note how few of them can drive
> in
> > an HOV lane), or running errands. Buying an 8-mpg behemoth for the one
> time a
> > year you may need to carry 8 people, as I said earlier, is like buying a
> Cray
> > supercomputer for your desktop just in case you need to decrypt a message
> from
> > Andromeda.
>
> I don't have any idea of what the guy or gal in the next lane was doing
> before they got into the next lane, or after they get out of it.
>
> I would agree that if I used an SUV the way I see many of them get used,
> they don't make much sense. But, what if the time I see them is when they
> are being used for the Exception Runs, instead of the Regular Use that the
> buyer had in mind when they bought the SUV?

You don't understand. Lloyd's used to seeing his elitist progressive
professor buddies driving their SUV's all over town, so he assumes
everyone else does that. Lloyd drives a Mercedes, so you can't accuse
him of that.

Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----