Handgun storage in a TJ?
04-04-2004, 04:33 PM
#111
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
In article <20040404112055771-0800@enews.newsguy.com>, Del Rawlins
<del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> writes:
>> Bleeding heart liberals stick out like a sore thumb. Not one of
>> them from John Kerry on down bothers to look up a fact.
>
>That is only because the facts do not support their agenda.
Same can be said about diehard conservatives, too...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -Edward R. Murrow
<del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> writes:
>> Bleeding heart liberals stick out like a sore thumb. Not one of
>> them from John Kerry on down bothers to look up a fact.
>
>That is only because the facts do not support their agenda.
Same can be said about diehard conservatives, too...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -Edward R. Murrow
04-04-2004, 04:33 PM
#112
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
In article <20040404112055771-0800@enews.newsguy.com>, Del Rawlins
<del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> writes:
>> Bleeding heart liberals stick out like a sore thumb. Not one of
>> them from John Kerry on down bothers to look up a fact.
>
>That is only because the facts do not support their agenda.
Same can be said about diehard conservatives, too...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -Edward R. Murrow
<del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> writes:
>> Bleeding heart liberals stick out like a sore thumb. Not one of
>> them from John Kerry on down bothers to look up a fact.
>
>That is only because the facts do not support their agenda.
Same can be said about diehard conservatives, too...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -Edward R. Murrow
04-04-2004, 04:33 PM
#113
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
In article <20040404112055771-0800@enews.newsguy.com>, Del Rawlins
<del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> writes:
>> Bleeding heart liberals stick out like a sore thumb. Not one of
>> them from John Kerry on down bothers to look up a fact.
>
>That is only because the facts do not support their agenda.
Same can be said about diehard conservatives, too...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -Edward R. Murrow
<del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> writes:
>> Bleeding heart liberals stick out like a sore thumb. Not one of
>> them from John Kerry on down bothers to look up a fact.
>
>That is only because the facts do not support their agenda.
Same can be said about diehard conservatives, too...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
"We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty." -Edward R. Murrow
04-04-2004, 05:13 PM
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
Here's some gasoline....
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
04-04-2004, 05:13 PM
#115
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
Here's some gasoline....
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
04-04-2004, 05:13 PM
#116
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
Here's some gasoline....
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
04-04-2004, 05:13 PM
#117
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
Here's some gasoline....
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
It was commented on how one side won't compromise....does this mean you
would?
find the middle ground that is.....
Just wondering what your middle ground is....
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040404112551925-0800@enews.newsguy.com...
> In <UTVbc.12481$w84.1090564@twister.southeast.rr.co m> Joseph P wrote:
> > Extremists in all forms are bad..the ppl that say "Ban Guns for our
> > children" and the idiots who feel it is necessary to cut deer in half
> > when "hunting" with an M-16 or AK-47.....can't we find middle
> > ground????
>
> Ignoring the fact that such an action is physically impossible, totally
> ilegal, and would be condemned by the overwhelming majority of hunters
> and gun owners, the fight over banning guns has nothing to do with
> hunting. Sporting issues are simply a wedge that the antis uses to
> divide gun owners so that they can dismantle our rights in detail. The
> M-16 and AK-47 are precisely the type of arms that our constitution
> recognizes our right to own. Although I'd personally prefer an M-14 or
> FAL. 8^)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
04-04-2004, 05:29 PM
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
"SB" <chicbears@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JT_bc.28645$RfJ.13367@twister01.bloor.is.net. cable.rogers.com...
> Just wondering what your middle ground is....
there is no middle ground. the 2nd ammendment is clear and non-conditional.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:JT_bc.28645$RfJ.13367@twister01.bloor.is.net. cable.rogers.com...
> Just wondering what your middle ground is....
there is no middle ground. the 2nd ammendment is clear and non-conditional.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
04-04-2004, 05:29 PM
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
"SB" <chicbears@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JT_bc.28645$RfJ.13367@twister01.bloor.is.net. cable.rogers.com...
> Just wondering what your middle ground is....
there is no middle ground. the 2nd ammendment is clear and non-conditional.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:JT_bc.28645$RfJ.13367@twister01.bloor.is.net. cable.rogers.com...
> Just wondering what your middle ground is....
there is no middle ground. the 2nd ammendment is clear and non-conditional.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
04-04-2004, 05:29 PM
#120
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Handgun storage in a TJ?
"SB" <chicbears@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JT_bc.28645$RfJ.13367@twister01.bloor.is.net. cable.rogers.com...
> Just wondering what your middle ground is....
there is no middle ground. the 2nd ammendment is clear and non-conditional.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:JT_bc.28645$RfJ.13367@twister01.bloor.is.net. cable.rogers.com...
> Just wondering what your middle ground is....
there is no middle ground. the 2nd ammendment is clear and non-conditional.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
