Handgun storage in a TJ?
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Ag5cc.14927$w84.1170535@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> no one can tell me they honestly need a fully
> automatic weapon for anything but mowing down gangbangers and the
> Taliban.
how about for mowing down "gangbangers" who would otherwise invade our
homes, hurt our families, and steal our stuff?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Ag5cc.14927$w84.1170535@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> no one can tell me they honestly need a fully
> automatic weapon for anything but mowing down gangbangers and the
> Taliban.
how about for mowing down "gangbangers" who would otherwise invade our
homes, hurt our families, and steal our stuff?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Ag5cc.14927$w84.1170535@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> no one can tell me they honestly need a fully
> automatic weapon for anything but mowing down gangbangers and the
> Taliban.
how about for mowing down "gangbangers" who would otherwise invade our
homes, hurt our families, and steal our stuff?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Ag5cc.14927$w84.1170535@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> no one can tell me they honestly need a fully
> automatic weapon for anything but mowing down gangbangers and the
> Taliban.
how about for mowing down "gangbangers" who would otherwise invade our
homes, hurt our families, and steal our stuff?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Ag5cc.14927$w84.1170535@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> no one can tell me they honestly need a fully
> automatic weapon for anything but mowing down gangbangers and the
> Taliban.
how about for mowing down "gangbangers" who would otherwise invade our
homes, hurt our families, and steal our stuff?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Ag5cc.14927$w84.1170535@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> no one can tell me they honestly need a fully
> automatic weapon for anything but mowing down gangbangers and the
> Taliban.
how about for mowing down "gangbangers" who would otherwise invade our
homes, hurt our families, and steal our stuff?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:Au8cc.2994$q23.29688946@news-text.cableinet.net...
> From reading the 2nd Amendment, isn't the intention of it that you had the
> right to bear arms in defence of yourself and the state as part of a well
> regulated militia ?
when that was written the average citizen _was_ the militia.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 04:32:34 GMT, "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>There always a middle ground..sometimes it so fine most can't see it.
I would say that the middle ground is on my side opposite the side
you're on. In other words, it is you who has to move if we are to get
to the 'middle' ground.
>There always a middle ground..sometimes it so fine most can't see it.
I would say that the middle ground is on my side opposite the side
you're on. In other words, it is you who has to move if we are to get
to the 'middle' ground.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 04:32:34 GMT, "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>There always a middle ground..sometimes it so fine most can't see it.
I would say that the middle ground is on my side opposite the side
you're on. In other words, it is you who has to move if we are to get
to the 'middle' ground.
>There always a middle ground..sometimes it so fine most can't see it.
I would say that the middle ground is on my side opposite the side
you're on. In other words, it is you who has to move if we are to get
to the 'middle' ground.
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 04:32:34 GMT, "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote:
>There always a middle ground..sometimes it so fine most can't see it.
I would say that the middle ground is on my side opposite the side
you're on. In other words, it is you who has to move if we are to get
to the 'middle' ground.
>There always a middle ground..sometimes it so fine most can't see it.
I would say that the middle ground is on my side opposite the side
you're on. In other words, it is you who has to move if we are to get
to the 'middle' ground.


