The great lie that is evolution
#101
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
#102
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
#103
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
#104
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
#105
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)
actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.
JQM
#106
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
#107
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
#108
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
#109
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:
> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."
Get a life, netKKKop.
#110
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Xomicron wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org