The great lie that is evolution
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html