Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> > this is a non-sequitor.
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.

well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)

JQM

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)

actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.

JQM

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)

actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.

JQM

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)

actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.

JQM

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> > > this is a non-sequitor.
> >
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
>
> well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
> mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass
:-)

actually, just in case you feel like being hit with back to the future level
thinking, isn't it paradoxical and therefore neither nonsensical or logical?
"this is a non-sequitur" means the statement doesn't make sense, but since
it is saying it doesn't make sense it therefore does. and if it does, then
that means that it doesn't. eek.

JQM

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:

> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."

Get a life, netKKKop.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:

> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."

Get a life, netKKKop.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:

> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."

Get a life, netKKKop.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Solon <readmysig@ilias.invalid> wrote in
news:E8KdnTcQnosfTCvdRVn2uQ@giganews.com:

> Xomicron spoke thusly:
>
>> <Snipped>
>
> Xomicron chose the wrong service:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.222.121.229
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@ca.mci.com
> X-Trace: nnrp1.uunet.ca 1085712193 24.222.121.229 (Thu, 27 May 2004
> 22:43:13 EDT)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:43:13 EDT
> Organization: MCI Canada News Reader Service
>
> Go to http://global.mci.com/ca/ , and lookup their Acceptable Use Policy:
> http://global.mci.com/ca/aup/?SetLang=en
> "Posting the same or similar message to one or more newsgroups
> (excessive cross-posting or multiple-posting, also known as "SPAM") is
> explicitly prohibited."

Get a life, netKKKop.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Xomicron wrote:

> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?

--
Graham Kennedy

Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org