Re: The great lie that is evolution
Shiva wrote:
> Science is objective, Or so the scientists want you to believe... |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Shiva wrote:
> Science is objective, Or so the scientists want you to believe... |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Shiva wrote:
> Science is objective, Or so the scientists want you to believe... |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those > changes in the first place. > > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support > our position. > > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess, > suppose, etc. but they don't "know." > > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing, > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science. |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those > changes in the first place. > > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support > our position. > > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess, > suppose, etc. but they don't "know." > > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing, > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science. |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those > changes in the first place. > > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support > our position. > > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess, > suppose, etc. but they don't "know." > > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing, > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science. |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca... > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those > changes in the first place. > > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support > our position. > > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess, > suppose, etc. but they don't "know." > > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing, > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science. |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur. well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-) JQM |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur. well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-) JQM |
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
> > Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur. well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-) JQM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands