The great lie that is evolution
 

I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
changes in the first place.

Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
our position.

Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
suppose, etc. but they don't "know."

Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.

>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."

Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.

>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.

>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."

Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.

>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.

>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."

Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.

>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.

>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."

Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.

>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.

Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.

Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.

Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.

Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.

Stinky bait, troll.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.

Stinky bait, troll.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.

Stinky bait, troll.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.

Stinky bait, troll.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Xomicron wrote:
>
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

That's all well and good, but where is this scientific evidence you
mentioned having?

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.

Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.

Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.

Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.

Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.

--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)


Peter

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)


Peter

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)


Peter

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:

> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.

My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)


Peter

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Please stop cross posting to groups that have no interest inyour drivel,
which happens to be almost all of the groups you posted to.





"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Please stop cross posting to groups that have no interest inyour drivel,
which happens to be almost all of the groups you posted to.





"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Please stop cross posting to groups that have no interest inyour drivel,
which happens to be almost all of the groups you posted to.





"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Please stop cross posting to groups that have no interest inyour drivel,
which happens to be almost all of the groups you posted to.





"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. wrote:

Can't you tell a troll when you see one?
--
C'Pi
"It's because of men like you that all must be destroyed."

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. wrote:

Can't you tell a troll when you see one?
--
C'Pi
"It's because of men like you that all must be destroyed."

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. wrote:

Can't you tell a troll when you see one?
--
C'Pi
"It's because of men like you that all must be destroyed."

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

Adam H. wrote:

Can't you tell a troll when you see one?
--
C'Pi
"It's because of men like you that all must be destroyed."

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Oh lord, not another damn cult member! My mom is one of those. She actually
believes in drinking the blood of her god, and eating his flesh! Ewww! Then
there's the Pentacostals who like to get together and make animal noises. Then
there's them wierdos who thought Tiger Woods was the antichrist.

You have been brainwashed into a cult. Face it. You are as whacked as any
idol-worshiper or snake god worshiper or Buddha worshipper or any other
***-worshipper. Evolution or not, you are in a non-rational, cultish mode of
thought, and that kind of thinking leads into some very strange places. The
Bible is a fine story, but you could find just about ANYTHING int there.

Good luck with that!

See ya in hell,

-jeff

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Oh lord, not another damn cult member! My mom is one of those. She actually
believes in drinking the blood of her god, and eating his flesh! Ewww! Then
there's the Pentacostals who like to get together and make animal noises. Then
there's them wierdos who thought Tiger Woods was the antichrist.

You have been brainwashed into a cult. Face it. You are as whacked as any
idol-worshiper or snake god worshiper or Buddha worshipper or any other
***-worshipper. Evolution or not, you are in a non-rational, cultish mode of
thought, and that kind of thinking leads into some very strange places. The
Bible is a fine story, but you could find just about ANYTHING int there.

Good luck with that!

See ya in hell,

-jeff

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

> Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.

Oh lord, not another damn cult member! My mom is one of those. She actually
believes in drinking the blood of her god, and eating his flesh! Ewww! Then
there's the Pentacostals who like to get together and make animal noises. Then
there's them wierdos who thought Tiger Woods was the antichrist.

You have been brainwashed into a cult. Face it. You are as whacked as any
idol-worshiper or snake god worshiper or Buddha worshipper or any other
***-worshipper. Evolution or not, you are in a non-rational, cultish mode of
thought, and that kind of thinking leads into some very strange places. The
Bible is a fine story, but you could find just about ANYTHING int there.

Good luck with that!

See ya in hell,

-jeff