The great lie that is evolution
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Nice troll. You really got them going.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
> > this is a non-sequitor.
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
>
> Correct. That statement fully qualifies as a non sequitur.
well, it does by itself . . . depends on whether or not you take "this" to
mean "this quote which i have just posted" or "this statement". smartass :-)
JQM
