The great lie that is evolution
05-27-2004, 10:43 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
The great lie that is evolution
I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
changes in the first place.
Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
our position.
Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
changes in the first place.
Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
our position.
Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
05-27-2004, 10:50 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 10:50 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 10:50 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 10:50 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>changes in the first place.
>
>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
>our position.
Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
that support creationism.
>
>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
Biogenesis isn't addressed by evolution.
>
>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
Yes. It's also called creationism, and honest scientists are tired of
it being passed off as science.
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 11:19 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
05-27-2004, 11:19 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
05-27-2004, 11:19 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
05-27-2004, 11:19 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>> those changes in the first place.
>>
>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>> support our position.
>
> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> that support creationism.
Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
05-27-2004, 11:29 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
There's no real point in trying to discuss the matter. Your opening
remarks show a fundamental ignorance of how science works and the
remainder shows that you're less interested in learning than in using
whatever "evidence" you have to try to discredit science.
Stinky bait, troll.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
